2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-015-2435-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating the Bures Measure to the Cauchy Two-Matrix Model

Abstract: The Bures metric is a natural choice in measuring the distance of density operators representing states in quantum mechanics. In the past few years a random matrix ensemble and the corresponding joint probability density function of its eigenvalues was identified. Moreover a relation with the Cauchy two-matrix model was discovered but never thoroughly investigated, leaving open in particular the following question: How are the kernels of the Pfaffian point process of the Bures random matrix ensemble related to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(218 reference statements)
1
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the above jpd also connects to the O(1) matrix model [53,54], as was discovered by Bertola et al while investigating the Cauchy two-matrix model [47]. Later on, Forrester and Kieburg demonstrated the explicit relationship between the unrestricted Bures-Hall ensembles and the Cauchy two-matrix model in [46]. This is very interesting since the former constitutes a Pfaffian point process, while the latter corresponds to a determinantal point process.…”
Section: Unrestricted Trace Bures-hall Ensemblementioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the above jpd also connects to the O(1) matrix model [53,54], as was discovered by Bertola et al while investigating the Cauchy two-matrix model [47]. Later on, Forrester and Kieburg demonstrated the explicit relationship between the unrestricted Bures-Hall ensembles and the Cauchy two-matrix model in [46]. This is very interesting since the former constitutes a Pfaffian point process, while the latter corresponds to a determinantal point process.…”
Section: Unrestricted Trace Bures-hall Ensemblementioning
confidence: 54%
“…when n odd. As shown in the Appendix A, the Pfaffian in (21) can be evaluated to a yield a compact result for the normalization factor as [46] C = 2 n 2 +2αn π n/2 n j=1 Γ(j + α + 1/2) Γ(j + 1)Γ(j + 2α + 1)…”
Section: Unrestricted Trace Bures-hall Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their study goes back to as early as 1950's where the focus was on exploring the behavior of dynamical systems, and the accompanying questions related to stochastic differential equations and Lyapunov exponents [1][2][3][4][5]. In the last few years there has been a revival in interest in their investigation because of their fascinating integrability properties [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and identification of new problems where they can be applied, such as random graph states [20], combinatorics [21], quantum entanglement [14] and multilayered multiple channel telecommunication [9,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the finite dimensionality case the determinants were found to involve certain Meijer G-functions. Meijer G-functions have also appeared as correlationkernels in product of Ginibre matrices or of truncated unitary matrices [8-10, 18, 19], Bures and Cauchy two-matrix models [16], and very recently in the results for product of a Wigner matrix and a Wishart matrix [23]. We give a brief introduction to Meijer G-functions in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%