Relating to the Sea: Enlivening the Ocean as an Actor in Eastern Sri Lanka

Abstract

Elements deemed part of 'nature' or the 'environment' have long been considered factors in political and social realities, but recent work by environmental historians, feminists, poststructuralists, and particularly posthumanists calls for them to be understood as actors. In this paper I build a case for considering the ocean as an actor on Sri Lanka's east coast, by bringing concepts around relationality and nonhuman agency into conversation with social theories of the sea and with the lived experiences of coastal residents. The ocean occupies a dynamic and central role on Sri Lanka's East coast, as demonstrated through daily practices and its centrality in the area's armed conflict, as well as by the devastation wreaked by the 2004 tsunami. By understanding the ocean as an actor it is possible to gain insight into the intersections of various phenomena, such as armed conflict and natural disaster, and to amplify the voices of those who occupy space closest to those intersections.

Killing Sharks: cultures and politics of encounter and the sea

“…Despite the strong, vibrant culture of the sea in this country -and other links to the ocean through issues as diverse as ocean-based trade, fisheries, and asylum-seeker policy -Australian geography remains largely terrestrial. Yet we have much to offer an emerging field of 'ocean geographies' (see Anderson and Peters 2014;Bear 2013;Lehman 2013;Warren & Gibson 2014), in areas of culture(s), practice, economies and governance. The unique perspective of the discipline in Australia can contribute to negotiating ocean spaces in ways that are both effective and ethical.…”

Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces: Giving Depth to Volume through Oceanic Thinking

“…In turn, this hydro-elemental assemblage allows us to re-think motion and matter and how it shapes the world as we know it (J. Anderson, 2012;Lehman, 2013a;Peters, 2012;Steinberg, 2013). …”

Extraction in Four Dimensions: Time, Space and the Emerging Geo(-)politics of Deep-Sea Mining

“…DSM, through the metaphorical and literal disruptions brought about by its capitalist imperatives, provokes new and unstable examples of this kind of geopolitics. It does so not only because it can be shaped by the relations between humanity and an active seabed and deep ocean (Lehman 2013). It also defies simple classification as a subsurface phenomenon: on the one hand, the seabed is a site of extraction that is a 'surface of earth' below a 'surface of water'.…”

“…Thus, the version of geopolitics presented here seeks to extend the burgeoning literature from resource geographies concerned with a material turn (e.g. Bakker and Bridge 2006;Lehman 2013;Li 2014;Valdivia 2015) by drawing upon recent, cognate efforts from resource anthropology (Kama 2016;Richardson and Weszkalnys 2014), including nascent analyses of resource temporalities (Weszkalnys 2015). From this perspective, deep-sea mineral resources 'become' political by being 'constitutive of and constituted within arrangements of substances, technologies, discourses, and the practices deployed by different kinds of actors' (Richardson and Weszkalnys 2014, 16).…”