2021
DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2021035972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between Bone Density and Primary Stability in the Posterior Mandibular Region in Patients Undergoing Dental Implant Treatment: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al 14 reported that BMD was not a factor affecting the ISQ value of primary implant stability for reasons that in addition to the density and quality of bone in the implant site, the primary implant stability was also affected by the process of implant cavity preparation, the type of implant used, and treatment of surface and geometric design of implants 15 . Harikrishnan et al 16 pointed out that sites with higher bone density (such as mandibular anterior teeth and mandibular posterior teeth) showed higher primary stability, and that the higher the HU value was, the higher the primary implant stability. Strub et al 17 also pointed out that the primary implant stability is the result of the compression of the local bone in the implant site, which is related to the mechanical interlocking between the bone and implant, and the quantity and quality of the local bone and other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al 14 reported that BMD was not a factor affecting the ISQ value of primary implant stability for reasons that in addition to the density and quality of bone in the implant site, the primary implant stability was also affected by the process of implant cavity preparation, the type of implant used, and treatment of surface and geometric design of implants 15 . Harikrishnan et al 16 pointed out that sites with higher bone density (such as mandibular anterior teeth and mandibular posterior teeth) showed higher primary stability, and that the higher the HU value was, the higher the primary implant stability. Strub et al 17 also pointed out that the primary implant stability is the result of the compression of the local bone in the implant site, which is related to the mechanical interlocking between the bone and implant, and the quantity and quality of the local bone and other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ширину альвеолярних відростків у ділянці імплантації вимірювали при вивченні зрізів СКТ щелеп у аксіальний проєкції. За реформатами СКТ у парасагітальній проєкції уточнювали висоту кісткової тканини в ділянці, де планували встановлення імплантатів, а також визначали кут нахилу імплантата при його встановленні, для дотримання паралельності штучних опор зі збереженими зубами, що необхідно для подальшого протезування [17]. Для оцінки стану кісткової тканини проводили ультразвукову денситометрію [18] на апараті «Omnisense 7000S» («Sunlight Medical», Ізраїль).…”
Section: матеріали і методи дослідженняunclassified