Relation between Convective Rainfall Properties and Antecedent Soil Moisture Heterogeneity Conditions in North Africa

Abstract

Abstract:Recent observational studies have demonstrated the relevance of soil moisture heterogeneity and the associated thermally-induced circulation on deep convection and rainfall triggering. However, whether this dynamical mechanism further influences rainfall properties-such as rain volume or timing-has yet to be confirmed by observational data. Here, we analyze 10 years of satellite-based sub-daily soil moisture and precipitation records and explore the potential of strong spatial gradients in morning soil moisture to influence the properties of afternoon rainfall in the North African region, at the 100-km scale. We find that the convective rain systems that form over locally drier soils and anomalously strong soil moisture gradients have a tendency to initiate earlier in the afternoon; they also yield lower volumes of rain, weaker intensity and lower spatial variability. The strongest sensitivity to antecedent soil conditions is identified for the timing of the rain onset; it is found to be correlated with the magnitude of the soil moisture gradient. Further analysis shows that the early initiation of rainfall over dry soils and strong surface gradients yet requires the presence of a very moist boundary layer on that day. Our findings agree well with the expected effects of thermally-induced circulation on rainfall properties suggested by theoretical studies and point to the potential of locally drier and heterogeneous soils to influence convective rainfall development. The systematic nature of the identified effect of soil moisture state on the onset time of rainstorms in the region is of particular relevance and may help foster research on rainfall predictability.

Resolving Sahelian thunderstorms improves mid-latitude weather forecasts

“…Rain rates are not directly coupled between model domains in official distributions where only the feedback of the prognostic variables (horizontal and vertical wind, virtual potential temperature, total air density, specific humidity, cloud water and cloud ice) is active. For the West African domain this feedback for precipitation in EXPLC simulations was introduced in order to not only affect atmospheric dynamics but also soil moisture, which directly influences the initiation of deep convection in this region 35 .…”

The impact of surface heterogeneity on the diurnal cycle of deep convection

“…In reality, spatial variability may also be induced by variations in surface conditions. Many observational studies in recent years have highlighted the importance of surface heterogeneity for the triggering and development of convection (e.g., Taylor et al, 2011; Petrova et al, 2018; Fast et al, 2019). Differential heating patterns at the surface generate horizontal pressure gradients, which induce horizontal flows from cool/wet to warm/dry surfaces.…”

Warm‐season precipitation drivers in northeastern Argentina: Diurnal cycle of the atmospheric moisture balance and land–atmosphere coupling

“…Some land–atmosphere interaction studies have been carried out at the inter‐annual and intra‐seasonal time scale in this region (Ruscica et al ., 2014; 2015; 2016; Spennemann et al ., 2018; Menéndez et al ., 2019); however, many land–atmosphere processes are still poorly understood, mainly at the diurnal scale and especially how they influence precipitation. In general, global and regional studies have found that the coupling seems to favour afternoon precipitation preferably over strong soil moisture gradients (Taylor et al ., 2011; Petrova et al ., 2018), but its magnitude and the signal of the feedbacks can change depending on the background wind (Froidevaux et al ., 2014; Ford et al ., 2015; Holgate et al ., 2019) and the moisture flux convergence (Petrova et al ., 2018; Welty and Zeng, 2018). Moreover, the coupling can be strong in certain synoptic/mesoscale situations but weak or non‐existent in the overall mean (Song et al ., 2016; Welty and Zeng, 2018), and it can vary widely depending on the type of dataset analysed (observation‐derived products, models, reanalyses, etc.…”