2016
DOI: 10.1399/eps.2016.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
2
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
49
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Sokołowicz et al (2019) reported that there was a significant effect of hen genotype on shape index. The significant effect of age on shape index could be associated with increasing egg weight and a statistically significant positive correlation between egg weight and shape index has been reported by Duman et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sokołowicz et al (2019) reported that there was a significant effect of hen genotype on shape index. The significant effect of age on shape index could be associated with increasing egg weight and a statistically significant positive correlation between egg weight and shape index has been reported by Duman et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The additional MDW on the treatments generally decreases SI, shell weight and shell thickness compared to treatments without MDW. SI is classified into 3 groups that are round egg (SI > 76), standard egg (SI = 72-76), and sharp egg (SI < 72) (Duman et al, 2016). Roberts (2004) reported that the eggshell of eggs contains up to 3 g of calcium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egg quality contains a number of characteristics, related to the yolk, the albumen and the shell, be divided into internal and external egg quality (Roberts 2004;Duman et al 2016). Egg quality is not only an important indicator for nutritional value, but it is also important for consumer appeal, egg price, hatchability performance, etc (Li et al 2018;Duru et al 2017;Blanco et al 2014;Hrnčár et al 2014;Zaheer 2015;Adedeji et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%