2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0198-9715(01)00039-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between landform and vegetation in alpine regions of Wallis, Switzerland. A multiscale remote sensing and GIS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MCS60 represents an integrated slope averaging a bigger area and is, therefore, an indicator of the landscape variability on a larger scale [49]. In this way, the landforms have already been highlighted as relevant indicators able to explain the spatial pattern of species distribution [53]. The digital crown height model (DCM90), which represents the only forest structural variable, was also of considerable relative importance in the predictive model, which was also found by Dufour et al [18], Bässler et al [47], and Féret & Asner [43].…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCS60 represents an integrated slope averaging a bigger area and is, therefore, an indicator of the landscape variability on a larger scale [49]. In this way, the landforms have already been highlighted as relevant indicators able to explain the spatial pattern of species distribution [53]. The digital crown height model (DCM90), which represents the only forest structural variable, was also of considerable relative importance in the predictive model, which was also found by Dufour et al [18], Bässler et al [47], and Féret & Asner [43].…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolstad, Swank and Vose (1998) noted the importance of the physical environment in determining the spatial diversity of the land surface of mountainous regions. Höersch et al (2002) and Abbate, Cavalli, Pascucci, Pignatti and Poscolieri (2006) concluded that there is a relationship between the vegetation types and topography in mountain areas. Hence, land surface parameters such as slope, aspect, profile curvature and plan curvature can be considered as important inputs in spatial analysis and estimation of the distribution of vegetation cover in mountainous environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three main methodological approaches to analysing relationships between vegetation and environmental site factors are discernible in current Geographical Information Systems (GIS) literature (Höersch, Braun & Schmidt, 2002). These are those that analyse relationships between vegetation and (i) direct influence of environmental site factors, (ii) entire set of environmental site factors, be it direct or indirect, and (iii) direct influence of environmental site factors based on the assumption that such influence can be reveal by land surface parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, landform classification has been proved a valuable processing tool for studies related to archaeology, ecology, agriculture, forestry, rural planning, hazards, etc. (Ho and Umitsu, 2011;Hoersch et al, 2002;Macmillan et al, 2003;Martin-Duque et al, 2003;Mcnab, 1993;Verhagen and Dragut, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%