2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-0763-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between microscopic interactions and macroscopic properties in ferroics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were supported with Monte-Carlo simulations by Amadé Bortis (see also Appendix C.5) and published most recently, see Ref. [467]. The chapter closes with a brief presentation of toroidal domain patterns in vortex-based nanomagnetic arrays.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Domains In Artificial Magneto-toroidal Crystalssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These findings were supported with Monte-Carlo simulations by Amadé Bortis (see also Appendix C.5) and published most recently, see Ref. [467]. The chapter closes with a brief presentation of toroidal domain patterns in vortex-based nanomagnetic arrays.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Domains In Artificial Magneto-toroidal Crystalssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These findings were supported with Monte-Carlo simulations by Amadé Bortis (see also Appendix C.5) and published most recently, see Ref. [6]. The chapter closes with a brief presentation of toroidal domain patterns in vortex-based nanomagnetic arrays.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In this case we still have = 8(J 2 − J 1 ) while 31 / ≈ −J 1 /[2(J 2 − J 1 )] and 40 / = −2J 1 /(J 2 − J 1 ), so that the energy cost of introducing ice-rule defects increases in proportion to (1 − J 2 /J 1 ) −1 until J 1 = J 2 where the ice model is recovered. The latter case has already been achieved experimentally in impressive work by Perrin et al [62] that introduced a height offset between the vertical and horizontal sublattices of square ice to equalize J 1 and J 2 , a result recently replicated by Farhan et al [82] and explored in a different system by Lehmann et al [83]. If the interactions were tuned to J 2 /J 1 = 0.99, then the energy cost of introducing defects would be 31 ≈ 50 and 40 = 200 , so that we can expect a substantial temperature window in which the number of defects is small and the pure F-model is a good approximation.…”
Section: Appendix: Exactly Solvable Limits For Artificial Square Icementioning
confidence: 79%