2019
DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2019.v31.i9.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between physicochemical characteristics and sensory profiles of cooked pumpkin varieties

Abstract: Since pumpkin is a widely consumed vegetable in the human diet, this study aimed to evaluate the relation between physicochemical characteristics and sensory profiles of pumpkin varieties. Samples were coded as follows:  PS is the scented pumpkin (PS01, PS02, PS03), MP is the moranga pumpkin (MP01), HP is the hybrid pumpkin (HP02, HP03, HP12), and CP is the commercial hybrid Tetsukabuto pumpkin. Pumpkin varieties were evaluated as to total titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids, carotenoid content, cooking tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average color values ( L *, a *, b *) of the freshly cooked microwaved samples (50.98, 10.91, and 50.96 respectively) were higher than those of microwaved samples previously reported by Silva et al (2019), which averaged 38.22, 4.6, and 11.3, respectively. However, other means of cooking C. moschata show a range that encompasses the values shown in this study (de Almeida et al., 2019; Gajewski et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2019). Regarding L * value, UFTP 22 (56.74) was significantly higher than all other accessions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The average color values ( L *, a *, b *) of the freshly cooked microwaved samples (50.98, 10.91, and 50.96 respectively) were higher than those of microwaved samples previously reported by Silva et al (2019), which averaged 38.22, 4.6, and 11.3, respectively. However, other means of cooking C. moschata show a range that encompasses the values shown in this study (de Almeida et al., 2019; Gajewski et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2019). Regarding L * value, UFTP 22 (56.74) was significantly higher than all other accessions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%