2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02186-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation and clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…30 However, studies in which collateral extent and function are studied as prognostic determinants of vascular outcome are hardly available. Only recently, Antoniucci et al 35 published a study on the significance of preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation in patients with acute MI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with coronary collateral circulation compared with patients without collaterals, without clear effects on clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Growth Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 However, studies in which collateral extent and function are studied as prognostic determinants of vascular outcome are hardly available. Only recently, Antoniucci et al 35 published a study on the significance of preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation in patients with acute MI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with coronary collateral circulation compared with patients without collaterals, without clear effects on clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Growth Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is true, then the atherosclerotic risk factors should be more often present in patient with collaterals than in those without. This is, however, not supported by the rather symmetric pattern of patient characteristics in most studies as metaanalysed in the current study [1,6,9,10,13,[15][16][17][18][19]. To assess this issue in a wider perspective, meta-regression was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although the exact mechanisms underlying the protective effects of the presence of collaterals are unclear, several factors might play a role. The collateral circulation has demonstrated clinical benefit regarding smaller infarct size, preservation of cardiac function after acute (re-) infarctions, and reduction in post-infarct ventricular dilatation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Following a total coronary occlusion, residual perfusion to the myocardium persists through native coronary collaterals that open when an intercoronary pressure gradient between the source and recipient vessel develops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relation between well-developed coronary collaterals and prognosis had not been fully assessed. In a published study by Antoniucci et al (11) findings in patients with acute MI, having symptoms onset within 6 hours and underwent primary angioplasty or stenting revealed the importance of preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation. According to results of this study in respect of mortality rates, patients with coronary collateral circulation have lower levels of mortality compared with patients without coronary collaterals but in respect of clinical outcomes the effect of coronary collaterals is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%