1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf00160581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between psychophysics and electrophysiology of flicker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown sensitivity of phasic ganglion cells to luminance flicker in macaque that is comparable to results obtained from humans using psychophysical threshold measurements [18]. In humans, two studies found CFF/ERG to be higher than psychophysical CFF [19,20], however the reverse has been reported in dog [21]. Both psychophysical [22] and ERG electrophysiological [23] measurements display a prominent rod/cone break, indicating the relationship between CFF and stimulus intensity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies have shown sensitivity of phasic ganglion cells to luminance flicker in macaque that is comparable to results obtained from humans using psychophysical threshold measurements [18]. In humans, two studies found CFF/ERG to be higher than psychophysical CFF [19,20], however the reverse has been reported in dog [21]. Both psychophysical [22] and ERG electrophysiological [23] measurements display a prominent rod/cone break, indicating the relationship between CFF and stimulus intensity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…With the noninvasive EEG technology, it seems impossible at present to identify the alpha-wave-and visually evoked potential-generating structures beyond the level worked out by Makeig et al (2002). Sometimes brain waves have been considered a mere consequence of linear processing, such as band-pass filtering or linear oscillation (van der Tweel 1964;Spekreijse 1966;Lopes da Silva et al 1974). More recently, a resetting of the phase of alpha waves by visual stimuli was described (Brandt 1997;Makeig et al 2002).…”
Section: Relationship To Results In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Usually brain waves are considered to be due to self-sustained oscillators which are necessarily nonlinear. Sometimes brain waves have been interpreted as a mere consequence of linear processing, such as bandpass filtering or linear oscillations (van der Tweel 1964;Spekreijse 1966;Lopes da Silva et al 1974). Linear and nonlinear contributions in brain waves were also demonstrated (Gebber et al 1999;Stam et al 1999).…”
Section: Linear Systems and Nonlinear Oscillatorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 and 4 show that ambient flicker at imperceptibly high frequencies can penetrate to the neural site for flicker adaptation, which is presumed to be in primary visual cortex (23). Indeed, earlier physiological studies have demonstrated activity in human visual cortex in response to imperceptibly high flicker frequencies (5,6), but these studies suggested no impact on perception as a result of this cortical activity. Our present findings show a clear, deleterious impact of this visuocortical response, as elicited by invisible flicker, on our ability to see subsequent perturbations in luminance or chromaticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The modulation transfer function (MTF) for human flicker perception, which traces modulation sensitivity as a function of flicker frequency, peaks around 8 Hz (4 Hz for chromatic flicker) and falls precipitously, by Ͼ100-fold, with increasing flicker frequency, out to the resolution limit (1)(2)(3)(4). The neural processing that mediates this sharply low-pass nature of the MTF for flicker perception remains little understood (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Specifically, the questions of what the number and anatomical loci of the neural filtering stages involved are remain open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%