An experiment tested the hypothesis that an observer's risk-taking set is related to his target-detection performance on a radar display Ss were given an equal number of trials under neutral, risky, and cautious sets, where differential sets were produced by instructions. As hypothesized, when instructed to adopt a risky set, Ss made earlier detections of targets and had a higher false-positive identification rate than the same Ss when instructed to adopt a cautious set. These findings support the contention that radar detection performance can be regarded as a decision task Baldwin, Wright, and Lehr (1964) have mil that an operator's psychological set, jduced by instructions, can affect his targetiection performance on a radar display. Set, mis instance, was varied by providing difcntial information concerning the attributes a target. They suggested that target-detec-,1 performance can be regarded as a deon task where the observer must decide, each scan of the radar antenna, if a target present. Signal detectability theory (Swets, jiner. & Birdsall, 1961) leads to the pretion that, if detection performance on a lar display is indeed a decision task, obier.-, under a ''risky" set should make eardetections of a target and more false Ttih than observers under a "cautious" set.•experiment was conducted to test the hy-•Jieqs that an observer's risk-taking set is ated to his target-detection performance on adar display.
METHOD '*'xas and apparatusThe subjects (Ss) were 12 :o\ees of the Human Research Unit. Fort Bliss ' •!• The radar target simulator used in this experi-; was an electromechanical device with a con-• Li J-5i" ctperimental booths The display was a simu-" oi a Plan Position Indicator (PPI) A central '•' pattern was simulated which extended apwatch 1 5 inch from the center of the display. 'i'Ki" were presented in a noise strobe and fol-•' a radial track The =\vcep rotation was fi\ed ' W \ 9-position rotary switch determined the -:i which the target would be visible, and a Nn