1953
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1953.tb12830.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation Between Roughness of Interface and Adherence of Porcelain Enamel to Steel

Abstract: SUMMARYPorcelain-enamel ground coats were prepared and applied under conditions that gave various degrees of adherence between enmel and a low-carbon steel (enameling iron). The variations in adherence were producedby (a) varying the amount of cobalt-oxide addition in the frit, (b) varying the type of metallic-oxide addition in the frit, keeping the amount constant at 0.8 weight percent, (c) varying the surface treatment of the metal before application of the enamel, by pickling, sandblasting, and polishing, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pyrolysis at 700 °C was not enough to seal the coating and create a barrier, as previously indicated (Figure 4), this temperature already promoted the infiltration of the substrate surface. Enamel coatings are known to adhere to steels due to mechanical anchoring into the surface roughness [46,47,48], an effect which can be further increased in sintered steels due to their intrinsic porosity. Furthermore, the absence of cracks between the coating and the steel substrate indicates good adhesion, while the presence of cohesive cracks in the coating, indicated by the white arrows in Figure 5a, supports that this class of PDC barrier coating fails by cohesive rather than by adhesive mechanisms [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pyrolysis at 700 °C was not enough to seal the coating and create a barrier, as previously indicated (Figure 4), this temperature already promoted the infiltration of the substrate surface. Enamel coatings are known to adhere to steels due to mechanical anchoring into the surface roughness [46,47,48], an effect which can be further increased in sintered steels due to their intrinsic porosity. Furthermore, the absence of cracks between the coating and the steel substrate indicates good adhesion, while the presence of cohesive cracks in the coating, indicated by the white arrows in Figure 5a, supports that this class of PDC barrier coating fails by cohesive rather than by adhesive mechanisms [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the metal oxides, CoO and NiO are the two best choices. Therefore, many studies have been conducted to investigate their roles in enhancing enamel‐steel interfacial adherence, and micro‐alloy precipitations at the interface between steel and enamels . These different micro‐alloy precipitations affect their adherence .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many studies have been conducted to investigate their roles in enhancing enamel-steel interfacial adherence, and micro-alloy precipitations at the interface between steel and enamels. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] These different micro-alloy precipitations affect their adherence. 17,19,21 However, little attention has been paid to understand the formation of these microalloy precipitations and their contribution to the enamel/ steel adherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the enameled heat sink is also operated continuously under elevated‐temperature environment (200–300 °C) in the nuclear power station. Therefore, research on the effect of crystallization temperature on the microstructures and mechanical properties of enamel substrate is an important piece of engineering research for the processing technology of enameled substrate …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%