2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation Between Structural and Functional Connectivity in Major Depressive Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
113
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
12
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the ACC has repeatedly been found to display increased activity in functional studies of MDD (Mayberg et al, 2005;Savitz and Drevets, 2009;Fan et al, 2013), and thus ACC coupling seems to distinguish BPD from mood disorders. In addition to this, studies of functional connectivity in MDD have also shown decreases in resting state coupling between the ACC network and the amygdala, medial temporal lobe, and areas of the frontal and prefrontal cortices (Davey et al, 2012;de Kwaasteniet et al, 2013;Pannekoek et al, 2014). These findings of task-based and resting state ACC functional and coupling abnormalities in MDD, in comparison with those of the current study and previous research, appear to distinguish BPD from mood disorders, at least in relation to ACC function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Interestingly, the ACC has repeatedly been found to display increased activity in functional studies of MDD (Mayberg et al, 2005;Savitz and Drevets, 2009;Fan et al, 2013), and thus ACC coupling seems to distinguish BPD from mood disorders. In addition to this, studies of functional connectivity in MDD have also shown decreases in resting state coupling between the ACC network and the amygdala, medial temporal lobe, and areas of the frontal and prefrontal cortices (Davey et al, 2012;de Kwaasteniet et al, 2013;Pannekoek et al, 2014). These findings of task-based and resting state ACC functional and coupling abnormalities in MDD, in comparison with those of the current study and previous research, appear to distinguish BPD from mood disorders, at least in relation to ACC function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, if structural hyperconnectivity has the same potential to break down a network's functioning as has a structurally hypoconnected network, then functional hyperconnectivity might be interpreted as a sign of functional compensation in response to the structural network impairments. Exactly this pattern of connectivity dissociation has been reported previously in healthy subjects notably in fronto‐parietal networks (Eickhoff et al., 2010) and in pathological conditions such as major and late life depression (de Kwaasteniet et al., 2013; Steffens, Taylor, Denny, Bergman, & Wang, 2011; Wu et al., 2011) and stroke (Zhang et al., 2014). Alternatively, however, an increase in functional connectivity may reflect a pathological loss of inhibitory neural activity within structurally damaged cortical networks as has been shown in patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Douaud, Filippini, Knight, Talbot, & Turner, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, a lot of interest has been devoted to deepening the understanding of how anatomical constraints shape functional connectivity (Honey et al 2010;Breakspear et al 2010;Cabral et al 2011;Deco et al 2012), and how this relationship can be affected by different pathologies (de Kwaasteniet et al 2013;van Schouwenburg et al 2013). In most of these studies, either the dynamics of FC are not taken into account, or it is modeled, but the information coming from the data and used to assess models is deduced with a static approach of FC [e.g., (Deco et al 2013b)].…”
Section: Phases Of (De)synchronization Between Functional and Structumentioning
confidence: 99%