2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This external force F was varied to represent changes in mechanical load. Although literature data on stresses in cancellous bone tissue vary (Heijink et al 2008;Jonkers et al 2008), the load we used is reasonable for human cancellous bone.…”
Section: D Fea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This external force F was varied to represent changes in mechanical load. Although literature data on stresses in cancellous bone tissue vary (Heijink et al 2008;Jonkers et al 2008), the load we used is reasonable for human cancellous bone.…”
Section: D Fea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, knowledge of the internal forces has been extensively used to provide improved understanding of clinical treatments e.g. joint replacement (Delp et al 1990;Piazza & Delp 2001) and its outcome (Jonkers et al 2008), or muscle replacement in crouch gait children (Delp et al 2007), but also to estimate the loading conditions in sports and activities of daily living (Pandy et al 1990;van Soest et al 1993;Bobbert 2001;Liu et al 2006;Lewis et al 2009;Blajer et al 2010). Direct measurement of muscle and joint contact forces is currently not possible, resulting in the recent development of MS modelling techniques that are able to provide access to these parameters, albeit indirectly, by means of numerical optimisation processes (Schellenberg et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this would produce a direct increase in solution time and in this case, use of a single quasi-static load produced an acceptable agreement with clinical data, although this assumption may not be valid for all implant types. Of greater importance might be the consideration of patient specific hip contact and muscle forces, and their pre-to postoperative changes (Jonkers et al 2008). With sufficient input data, multi-patient analysis using this method could be achieved with relatively low computational expense by modifying this verified mesh by freeform deformation (Fernandez et al 2013), and employing mesh morphing to incorporate the effects of surgical variability (Bah et al 2011) and implant sizing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%