2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental findings show that capacity drops are often observed at merges even if downstream traffic conditions are in free-flow, e.g. (Cassidy and Bertini, 1999;Kerner, 2002;Chung et al, 2007;Sarvi et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2011). The magnitude of the capacity drops is mentioned to be between 10 to 30% of the maximal observed flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experimental findings show that capacity drops are often observed at merges even if downstream traffic conditions are in free-flow, e.g. (Cassidy and Bertini, 1999;Kerner, 2002;Chung et al, 2007;Sarvi et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2011). The magnitude of the capacity drops is mentioned to be between 10 to 30% of the maximal observed flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is a relation between the capacity of a freeway and the density/flow of vehicles [36,37]. Using capacity and density it is easy to detect flowing traffic, when the proposed system cannot detect it.…”
Section: Figure 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our system can find traffic/number of vehicles within a specific zone without any initializing and is therefore able to detect bottlenecks. Our method of finding traffic is approximately the same as in other studies, such as [36,37], but the detection of cars is an image processing system that is intelligent and finds normal/heavy traffic using feedback.…”
Section: Figure 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is called the capacity drop. It is described extensively in literature and estimations for the reduction vary, but are typically around 10% (Cassidy and Bertini, 1999, Chung et al, 2007, Dijker et al, 1997, Hall and Agyemang-Duah, 1991. In the analyses we will only use the queue discharge rate.…”
Section: Queue Discharge Ratementioning
confidence: 99%