What is the optimal treatment strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations? W. Willaert, M. Daenen, P. Bomans, G. Verleden, M. Decramer. #ERS Journals Ltd 2002. ABSTRACT: The present study aims to determine whether treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations with intravenous steroids and aerosol bronchodilators (group I) is superior to oral steroids and multiple dose inhaler (MDI) bronchodilators with a spacer (group II).Group I received 40 mg methylprednisolone?day -1 intravenously with a decrease to 20 mg after 10 days and a further decrease of 4 mg?4 days -1 . Aerosol therapy consisted of 10 mg salbutamol and 1 mg ipratropiumbromide?day -1 . Group II received 32 mg methylprednisolone orally for 1 week followed by 24 mg?day -1 for 4 days and a subsequent decrease of 4 mg?week -1 . Duovent1 MDI with a spacer was given at a dose of 1.6 mg fenoterol and 640 mg ipratropiumbromide?day -1 . In group I (n=19) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) rose from 0.82¡0.46 to 0.91¡0.47 L and average dyspnoea decreased from 6.0¡1.9 to 4.1¡2.6 within 10 days. The Chronic Respiratory Disease Index Questionnaire (CRQ) score increased from 78¡24 to 90¡24 points after 4 weeks. In group II (n=18) FEV1 increased from 0.70¡0.27 to 0.90¡0.29 L, dyspnoea regressed from 6.2¡2.4 to 2.7¡2.6 and CRQ from 67¡17 to 86¡20. Both groups showed similar results in dropout rate, length of hospital stay and patient satisfaction.In conclusion, the two treatment strategies appear equally effective in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, although oral steroids and metered dose inhaler bronchodilators appear associated with a higher risk of hospital re-admission. [8]. Notwithstanding the increase in the number of trials in the last decade evaluating the effect of steroids in COPD, little research has been done to compare orally to intravenously administered steroids when treating an exacerbation in casualty or in patients admitted to hospital.More attention has been given to comparing wet nebulizers to metered dose inhaler (MDI) as a device for bronchodilator delivery in COPD. A meta-analysis by TURNER et al. [9] and numerous other trials have shown the two devices to be equally effective in the treatment of stable [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and acute [9] COPD in inand outpatient settings. No difference was reported in the effect of bronchodilation, in pulmonary function tests (PFTs), exercise performance, symptom scores or extra b 2 -agonist use. The degree of bronchodilation was considered to be a reflection of the administered dose rather than the mode of administration.There is no consensus on the optimal route of administration for steroids and the device for bronchodilators. Therefore, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to investigate the hypothesis that treatment of COPD exacerbations with oral corticosteroids and MDI bronchodilators, compared to intravenous corticosteroids and aerosol bronchodilators, would not result in different ...