2001
DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.5.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of Occupational Exposure to Respiratory Symptoms and Asthma in a General Population Sample: Self-reported versus Interview-based Exposure Data

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine how the consistency of self-reported exposure to dust or gas, asbestos, and quartz varied between subjects with and those without respiratory symptoms and asthma in a Norwegian community sample () in 1987-1988. Exposure characterization obtained in a structured work history interview was used as the "gold standard." The authors also wanted to assess how the exposure-disease relation differed when the exposure was based on self-reported versus interview-obtained data. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BAKKE et al [25] have shown that more specific outcome items, such as physician diagnosed-asthma, are less associated with bias of the reporting of exposure, as compared with less sensitive items, such as symptom-based questions. In the present study similar trends were found with increased reporting of exposure with increasing prevalence of both symptoms and physician-diagnosed asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BAKKE et al [25] have shown that more specific outcome items, such as physician diagnosed-asthma, are less associated with bias of the reporting of exposure, as compared with less sensitive items, such as symptom-based questions. In the present study similar trends were found with increased reporting of exposure with increasing prevalence of both symptoms and physician-diagnosed asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Norwegian study, the sensitivity of the question on exposure to dust and gas was biased by respiratory symptoms, but hardly at all by physician-diagnosed asthma [16], the outcome used in the present study. Bias is more important in sensitivity than it is in specificity for the effect of misclassification of exposure for a common exposure, such as the gassings in the present study [17].…”
Section: Asthma Irritants and Gases E Andersson Et Almentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It could be that the validity of the self-reported exposure to various agents is higher for women than men (18). However, the JEM-based exposure characterization is less subject to recall bias than the self-reported exposure characterization (6,19,20).…”
Section: Skorge Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%