2022
DOI: 10.1111/tran.12551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational area studies: Russia and geographies of knowledge

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…debates on in-betweenness(Cheskin & Jašina-Schäfer, 2022;Oliva, 2000;Zhao, 2017), I revisited my evolving positionality in the process of conducting fieldwork, interpreting information, and writing academic articles during my master's and doctoral periods. In conclusion, it is evident that my researcher positionalities have significantly influenced the direction and outcomes of my research projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…debates on in-betweenness(Cheskin & Jašina-Schäfer, 2022;Oliva, 2000;Zhao, 2017), I revisited my evolving positionality in the process of conducting fieldwork, interpreting information, and writing academic articles during my master's and doctoral periods. In conclusion, it is evident that my researcher positionalities have significantly influenced the direction and outcomes of my research projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%