2012
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational Bureaucracy: Structuring Reciprocal Relationships into Roles

Abstract: We describe a hybrid relational bureaucratic form with structures that embed three processes of reciprocal interrelating-relational coproduction, relational coordination, and relational leadership-into the roles of customers, workers, and managers. We show how these role-based relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect foster participants' attentiveness to the situation and to one another, enabling the caring, timely, and knowledgeable responses found in the relational form, along with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
204
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
204
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with Gittell and Douglass (2012) who argue that relations within organizations can be organized as structured roles to coordinate collective action to produce caring, timely, and knowledgeable responses. Collective effort from within and outside an organization conjoins structure, action, and agency to enable restoration of basic organizing practices and relationships within an organization-this is resilience.…”
Section: Collective Effortsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This is consistent with Gittell and Douglass (2012) who argue that relations within organizations can be organized as structured roles to coordinate collective action to produce caring, timely, and knowledgeable responses. Collective effort from within and outside an organization conjoins structure, action, and agency to enable restoration of basic organizing practices and relationships within an organization-this is resilience.…”
Section: Collective Effortsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Marchington and Kynighou (2012) highlight the importance of high level of employee engagement that enables firms to successfully differentiate themselves from the competitors in times of crises. Gittell and Douglass (2012) have argued that "relational reserves", the interpersonal bonds among employees are crucial for dealing with crises. Roberts, Stout, and Halpern (1994) have argued that locus of decision-making also has important implications for organizational resilience.…”
Section: Crisis Resilience and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bureaucratic work can encourage self-transcendence by emphasizing procedural fairness of impartial conduct, due process and formal protection against irrational and abusive behavior of co-workers (du Gay, 2000Gay, , 2005. Bureaucratic work can also emphasize equal treatment of all irrespective of belonging to an in-group (Parsons, 1951;Gittell and Douglas 2012), concern with socially responsible conduct (Goodsell, 2005) and alleviation of social inequalities (Henderson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Self-enhancement Vs Self-transcendence Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merton, 1952;Thompson and Broek, 2010;Ritzer, 2011) and those who highlight its individualizing and pro-social implications (e.g. Kohn, 1971;du Gay, 2005;Gittell and Douglas, 2012). Recently, there has been an increased concern with the reconciliation of these perspectives (Adler, 2012;Kallinikos, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%