2013
DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational Features in Fine-Grained Opinion Analysis

Abstract: Fine-grained opinion analysis methods often make use of linguistic features but typically do not take the interaction between opinions into account. This article describes a set of experiments that demonstrate that relational features, mainly derived from dependency-syntactic and semantic role structures, can significantly improve the performance of automatic systems for a number of fine-grained opinion analysis tasks: marking up opinion expressions, finding opinion holders, and determining the polarities of o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choi and Cardie take attributes (polarity and intensity) of opinion expressions into consideration and improve both tasks of opinion expression identification and attribute prediction within a joint model [11]. Johansson and Moschitti extract relational features of polarity pairs from the syntactic and semantic analysis result and show that this interaction information brings obvious improvement [12,13]. Yang and Cardie formulate the opinion expression extraction and attribute classification as a segmentation problem and segment attribute classification [14].…”
Section: Opinion Expression Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi and Cardie take attributes (polarity and intensity) of opinion expressions into consideration and improve both tasks of opinion expression identification and attribute prediction within a joint model [11]. Johansson and Moschitti extract relational features of polarity pairs from the syntactic and semantic analysis result and show that this interaction information brings obvious improvement [12,13]. Yang and Cardie formulate the opinion expression extraction and attribute classification as a segmentation problem and segment attribute classification [14].…”
Section: Opinion Expression Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al (2005) and Breck et al (2007) used CRFs for finding opinion holders and recognizing opinion expressions, respectively. The two things are predicted jointly by Choi et al (2006), with integer programming, and Johansson and Moschitti (2010), via reranking. The same method was applied later for joint prediction of opinion expressions and their polarities (Johansson and Moschitti, 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our experiments, we use the sequence labeler from Johansson and Moschitti (2013), Mul-5 The split-up of training and test set on the MPQA corpus follows the specification of Johansson and Moschitti (2013). Table 6: F-scores of opinion-holder classifiers on the MPQA corpus and the new VERB corpus.…”
Section: Some Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%