Relational quality in public–private partnerships: understanding social relationships in contract-based exchanges

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic literature review of studies addressing relational quality in public–private partnerships (PPPs). The ambition of this study is twofold: first, to present more clarity regarding the definition of the concept. Second, to develop a framework that explains the antecedents, characteristics and outcomes of relational quality in PPPs.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review of 99 academic articles, which were analyzed and coded on the definition, characteristics, antecedents and outcomes of relational quality.FindingsThe study shows that trust, communication, commitment, openness and reciprocity are considered core aspects of the concept. The analysis further identifies important antecedents (e.g. shared values, leadership) and outcomes (performance, innovation) of relational quality in PPPs. The findings result in the development of a framework on relational quality in PPPs to be used for further research.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings indicate that relational quality is valuable for the functioning of PPPs, but the current focus of this review excludes studies addressing relational quality in other types of collaboration and public–private exchange. The lessons from these research fields might further improve people’s understanding of relational quality.Practical implicationsPractitioners should pay attention to relational quality in long-term PPPs. Among others, (process) management activities might contribute to relational quality as it stimulates communication and openness.Originality/valueThe presented framework explaining antecedents, characteristics and outcomes of relational quality allows for more structured use of this concept in future research.

National and sectoral information technology planning: a systematic literature review

“…4.5.2 Communication with citizens. Communication with citizens "as providing or exchanging information" (Warsen, 2023) is important, as the lack of awareness among citizens regarding government affairs and the objectives of IT initiatives will substantially hinder their engagement in said endeavors (InforDev and Center for Democracy and Technology, 2002, p. 17). Citizens and stakeholders are more likely to accept the concept of improved services if they are made aware of IT plans and their benefits.…”

Repowerment beyond empowerment: collaborative accountability of citizens, corporations and civil servants

“…Corporations' accountability helping government in the form of PPP varies according to policy domains, partners, and binding contracts (Hodge et al, 2010). In short, PPP has become an essential means of sharing the risks and rewards of innovation between government and corporations (Laplane and Mazzucato, 2019;Warsen, 2023).…”

“…, 2010). In short, PPP has become an essential means of sharing the risks and rewards of innovation between government and corporations (Laplane and Mazzucato, 2019; Warsen, 2023).…”