2016
DOI: 10.5964/jnc.v2i2.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational quantitative reasoning in kindergarten predicts mathematical achievement in third grade

Abstract: Tremendous variation in elementary school children's mathematical achievement can partly be traced back to differences in early domain-specific quantitative competencies. While previous research mainly focused on numerical magnitude representation and counting, we tested the long-term effects of relational quantitative reasoning. Before children (N = 51) entered school (i.e. at age 5-6), we assessed this competence with a test that required no knowledge about Arabic numerals. Two and a half years later, when c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Native Numbers includes three sets of five activities using the different representations for quantity recognition, ordinality, and relational language. Studies of relational language and ordinality with young participants are underexplored areas of numerical cognition, as are studies using number rods, which are introduced as the first activity (e.g., Coles & Sinclair, 2018;Goffin & Ansari, 2016;Schalk et al, 2016;Morsanyi et al, 2018;Venenciano et al, 2012).…”
Section: Future Directions For Classroom Use and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Native Numbers includes three sets of five activities using the different representations for quantity recognition, ordinality, and relational language. Studies of relational language and ordinality with young participants are underexplored areas of numerical cognition, as are studies using number rods, which are introduced as the first activity (e.g., Coles & Sinclair, 2018;Goffin & Ansari, 2016;Schalk et al, 2016;Morsanyi et al, 2018;Venenciano et al, 2012).…”
Section: Future Directions For Classroom Use and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, increasing numbers of researchers have challenged the dominant cardinal view of number cognition, and have investigated tasks that engage ordinal or relational thinking (e.g., Schalk et al, 2016). For example, Lyons and Beilock (2011) created an ordinal task that consists of a sequence of three numerals (instead of symbols, dots can be used as well).…”
Section: Challenges To the Dominance Of Cardinalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of the number song and language point to a powerful temporal sense of number. Schalk et al (2016) report on a study that followed children from Grades 1 to 3 and found a correlation between the capacity for relational reasoning (assessed via continuing patterns in numbers of objects) and mathematical achievement tested two and a half years later. This study again provides behavioural evidence for the idea that relational judgments between quantities (which are linked to ordinality) are significant for mathematical success.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%