2015
DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2014.997969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational sociology: a well-defined sociological paradigm or a challenging ‘relational turn’ in sociology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, when theorising societal responses to climate change, the relational practices of personal life may be screened out and denied any capacities for energising collective restructuring of structures. Yet sociologist have recently reasserted and reclaimed the discipline's long-term acknowledgment that individuals are relational (Emirbayer 1997, Crossley 2011, Prandini 2015, Roseneil and Ketokivi 2016. In a relational sociology, personal lives must be implicated in wider social process since individuals and social life are mutually constituted through relationships and the relational processes or practices of their making.…”
Section: Relationality and Individualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, when theorising societal responses to climate change, the relational practices of personal life may be screened out and denied any capacities for energising collective restructuring of structures. Yet sociologist have recently reasserted and reclaimed the discipline's long-term acknowledgment that individuals are relational (Emirbayer 1997, Crossley 2011, Prandini 2015, Roseneil and Ketokivi 2016. In a relational sociology, personal lives must be implicated in wider social process since individuals and social life are mutually constituted through relationships and the relational processes or practices of their making.…”
Section: Relationality and Individualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite sustained calls for embedding the relational in descriptions of organizations (e.g., Follett, 1927Follett, , 1949Mayo, 1933;Uhl-Bien & Ospina, 2012) and educational administration and leadership (Griffiths, 1959;Leithwood & Duke, 1999;Yauch, 1949) what has remained somewhat illusive is a robust theory of relations and the intellectual resources to make it happen. Aligning with the 'relational turn' in the social sciences Prandini, 2015) and a 'theory turn' in educational administration and leadership (Niesche, 2018), it is arguably not surprising to see the emergence of a relational alternative. Significantly, the relational approach that I am advancing here offers a methodological framing and the necessary theoretical resources to enact it.…”
Section: Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some regard relational thinking as both a precursor and a subset of social network analysis (Erikson 2013), its fundamental elements have analytical and explanatory power beyond specific methodologies (Mische 2011). At present, it is best conceived as an umbrella term for different theoretical strands, which challenge some established ideas, theories and methods in sociology, such as rational choice theory and categorical approaches that emphasize shared attributes (Dépelteau 2015;Prandini 2015). Theorists adopting a relational perspective reject the idea that 'entities', 'essences' or 'realities' have 'independent existences present anterior to any relation' (Cassirer 1953: 36, cited in Emirbayer 1997.…”
Section: Reframing Transnational Engagement From a Relational Perspecmentioning
confidence: 99%