Relational values in evaluations of upstream social outcomes of watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: a review

Bremer, Leah L.; Brauman, Kate A.; Nelson, Sara; Prado, Kelly Meza; Wilburn, Eric; Fiorini, Ana Carolina Oliveira

doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.024

Cited by 59 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One such pre-existing norm is reciprocity, or the relational notion that people should give back to those who help them. Recent research exploring the drivers of environmental values has shown that they can be driven by a perceived relationship with nature (Bremer et al 2018, Chan et al 2016, 2017. Reciprocity is considered one of several shared principles of moral psychology, common across many cultures (Haidt 2007) and has been observed to motivate human behavior in a variety of decision contexts (Axelrod & Hamilton 1981;Falk & Fischbacher 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia

Grillos

Bottazzi²,

Crespo

et al. 2019

Ecological Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia

Grillos

Bottazzi²,

Crespo

et al. 2019

Ecological Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rapid and intensive land use change, in particular, may be associated with the erosion of both types of relationships . Focusing on the interlinked social-ecological dimensions of landscape change, in turn, could help to combat inequality regarding access to nature and its benefits (Berbés-Blázquez et al, 2016;Scoones et al, 2020), could counteract disconnection from nature (Miller, 2005;Pyle, 2003) and may also foster conservation and restoration initiatives (Bremer et al, 2018;Skubel et al, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding relational values in cultural landscapes in Romania and Germany

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In environmental conservation, academics and practitioners articulate a wide range of values to convey attributes of nature to decisionmakers. The diversity regarding theoretical conceptualisations related to values is high (Horcea-Milcu et al., 2019)-from individual, shared or social values to monetary values, or held and assigned values, as well as intrinsic or instrumental values (Dietz et al., 2005; Kenter et al., 2015; Rawluk et al., 2018). One debate stemming from this diversity is between the acknowledgement of intrinsic and instrumental values (Tallis & Lubchenco, 2014). To bridge intrinsic and instrumental values of nature, a new framing has emergedrelational values (Muraca, 2011). Relational values can be defined as preferences and principles about human-nature relationships (Chan

show abstract

“…While each scheme has advantages, disadvantages, and room for improvement (Table S1), three cross-cutting challenges exist: (1) demonstrating sustained financial viability; (2) establishing credibility with effective verification and accounting; and (3) balancing trade-offs to achieve general acceptability, and to establish and maintain social license to operate (Table S1). [24][25][26] Here, we suggest that PES schemes dedicated to, and specifically designed for, wetland restoration will be more effective than single-service-focused schemes and non-financed instruments in not only increasing the rate and extent of wetland restoration, but also increasing the flow of multiple ecosystem services. Taking on board the challenges faced by many PES schemes (Table S1), we propose using a common asset trust (CAT) approach as the platform for a PES scheme designed to enhance wetland restoration efforts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Financial incentives for large-scale wetland restoration: Beyond markets to common asset trusts

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wetlands provide $47.4 trillion/year worth of ecosystem services globally and support immense biodiversity, yet face widespread drainage and pollution, and large-scale wetlands restoration is urgently needed. Payment for ecosystem service (PES) schemes provide a viable avenue for funding large-scale wetland restoration. However, schemes around the globe differ substantially in their goals, structure, challenges, and effectiveness in supporting large-scale wetland restoration. Here, we suggest wetland-based PES schemes use common asset trusts (CATs) to build investment portfolios of wetlands across landscapes that sustain and enhance overall provision of multiple ecosystem services. CATs can meet the needs of multiple investors, permit bundled payments, and provide flexibility to invest in the restoration of numerous services/values, all using a coordinated, highly collaborative, prioritized, and transparent process. CATs would support financial viability, facilitate efficiency to reduce administrative burdens, and enable credibility and social licence building to restore wetland values and services globally. ll

show abstract

Relational values in evaluations of upstream social outcomes of watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: a review

Cited by 59 publications

References 47 publications

In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia

In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia

Understanding relational values in cultural landscapes in Romania and Germany

Financial incentives for large-scale wetland restoration: Beyond markets to common asset trusts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About