2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between C9orf72 expansion size in blood, age at onset, age at collection and transmission across generations in patients and presymptomatic carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these studies could indeed point to anticipation, our work suggests that this may not be the case. In successive generations, we actually noticed that the repeat expansion had a tendency to contract, which was also reported by others [12]. One wonders, therefore, whether the earlier age at onset reported in the former study might be a reflection of selection bias, recall bias, and/or diagnostic bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although these studies could indeed point to anticipation, our work suggests that this may not be the case. In successive generations, we actually noticed that the repeat expansion had a tendency to contract, which was also reported by others [12]. One wonders, therefore, whether the earlier age at onset reported in the former study might be a reflection of selection bias, recall bias, and/or diagnostic bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Information is provided regarding the onset age (OA), death age (DA), expansion size (S), methylation level (M), and expression level (E), when available (N/A) repeat length, and hence, the length in blood at a given point in time may be a poor reflection of the original length. As such, this could explain conflicting results reported in the literature, depending on the time-points or tissues analyzed as well as the number of unaffected individuals studied [11,12,14,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not surprisingly therefore, the asymmetry of the replication fork leads to orientation-dependent repeat instability. Indeed, CAG/CTG repeats tend to contract if the CTG tract is in the lagging strand template and tend to expand if the CAG tract is in the lagging strand template in bacterial (35,283), yeast (161,162,284,285), and mammalian cells (206,280,286). Typically, this orientation dependence is explained by the fact that an imperfect hairpin formed by a (CTG) n tract is more stable than the one formed by a (CAG) n tract.…”
Section: Evidence That Replication Promotes Repeat Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diseases with strong correlations between the number of repeats and age of onset are SCA7 (16,17), SCA3 (18), SCA2 (19 -21), SCA37 (22), HD (23)(24)(25)(26), DM1 (27,28), dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) (29,30), X-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP) (31), familial adult myoclonic epilepsy 3 (FAME3) (32), and Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) (33,34). For some disorders, the correlation between the number of repeats and symptom manifestation is less clear, although there typically is a marginally significant trend (35)(36)(37)(38)(39). Second, expansion of one disease-causing repeat does not promote expansions of other repeats in the patient's genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%