CHLORINE:amperometric versus potentiometric imple, reliable, inexpensive, and accurate methods are needed for determining oxidizing species of chlorine and chlorine dioxide in water contaminated with other materials. These compounds are used as chemical disinfection agents in food-processing waters. These processing waters, which include fruit and vegetable washing and conveying fluids and poultry chiller water, normally contain substantial quantities of organic material and turbidity.Amperometric titration is a useful analytical tool that is widely considered one of the most reliable and sensitive techniques for quantifying chlorine in water samples. 1 It differs from the alternative spectrophotometric methods commonly used, which are rendered inoperative by variations in absorptivity in anything but "clean" water. However, there is much confusion about the different methods of endpoint detection. In addition, terms like "polarized," "depolarized," and "applied potential" are not always used consistently. Some manufacturers of S The ability to accurately measure chlorine or other disinfectants in water is important for control of microorganisms. Whereas amperometry is specified for chlorine in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, manufacturers of automatic titrators are marketing their potentiometric devices for such titrations. In this article, the electrochemical basis for amperometric and potentiometric endpoint detection is examined, and two amperometric and two potentiometric methods are compared. Both amperometric methods are shown to be superior to potentiometric endpoint detection and amenable to automatic titration. Finally, fundamentals of amperometry are discussed, and the simple circuit that was used to perform amperometric titrations using a modified automated pH/potentiometric titrator is presented.