2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between absorber layer defect density and performance of a‐Si:H and µc‐Si:H solar cells studied over a wide range of defect densities generated by 2 MeV electron bombardment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when the density of the surface defects increases from 10 13 cm -2 to 5 × 10 16 cm -2 , the short-circuit current density decreases drastically from 16.43 mA/cm 2 to 11.47 mA/cm 2 (Figure 6(a)). This decrease is due to increased recombination centers at the interface buffer layer/i-(a-Si:H), favouring electron traps but also the loss by optical absorption of the incident light [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when the density of the surface defects increases from 10 13 cm -2 to 5 × 10 16 cm -2 , the short-circuit current density decreases drastically from 16.43 mA/cm 2 to 11.47 mA/cm 2 (Figure 6(a)). This decrease is due to increased recombination centers at the interface buffer layer/i-(a-Si:H), favouring electron traps but also the loss by optical absorption of the incident light [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasma might damage the PET substrate , dissolving contaminating atoms like carbon or oxygen from the substrate, which are subsequently incorporated into the silicon layers. Incorporation of these atoms may cause additional electronic defects, reducing the photoelectronic quality of the silicon layer, which consequently would impede the charge carrier collection efficiency . Furthermore, PET is known to be permeable to water and oxygen , so without a diffusion barrier such as ZnSnO x , impurities may also enter the silicon layers though the PET substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defect density increase in a-Si:H may be achieved with prolonged illumination [7], whereas c-Si:H is stable to the light soaking, and thus requires other methods to be modified. In our previous works [8][9][10][11][12] we presented experiments, utilizing 2 MeV electron irradiation and successive annealing, to achieve a defect density in a-Si:H and c-Si:H material and solar cells, which can be varied over several orders of magnitude. In the experiment, the spin density, N S , measured with electron spin resonance (ESR), was taken as a measure of the defect density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiment, the spin density, N S , measured with electron spin resonance (ESR), was taken as a measure of the defect density. Both solar cells and ESR samples are exposed to the same electron bombardmentannealing procedure, which enables us to investigate the recombination-related variations of cell performance [9][10][11][12]. In the present study we use data on both defect density [12] and illumination intensity dependencies obtained on the same set of a-Si:H and c-Si:H solar cells to investigate the relation between the absorber layer defect density and V OC using the simplest theoretical formulation given earlier for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%