2015
DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1081293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between acoustic measures and speech naturalness ratings in Parkinson’s disease: A within-speaker approach

Abstract: This study investigated the acoustic basis of across-utterance, within-speaker variation in speech naturalness for four speakers with dysarthria secondary to Parkinson's disease (PD). Speakers read sentences and produced spontaneous speech. Acoustic measures of fundamental frequency, phrase-final syllable lengthening, intensity and speech rate were obtained. A group of listeners judged speech naturalness using a nine-point Likert scale. Relationships between judgements of speech naturalness and acoustic measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Symptoms of the speech disorder may for instance limit a speaker´s intelligibility and naturalness as perceived by communication partners. In adults with dysarthria, intelligibility and naturalness have been shown to be closely connected and determined by symptoms related to different speech subsystems (Klopfenstein, 2015;Legner & Ziegler, 2022;Schölderle et al, 2016). In children with dysarthria, communication-related research has predominantly focused on intelligibility, while naturalness has not been studied comprehensively so far, neither on its own, nor in its relationship to intelligibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms of the speech disorder may for instance limit a speaker´s intelligibility and naturalness as perceived by communication partners. In adults with dysarthria, intelligibility and naturalness have been shown to be closely connected and determined by symptoms related to different speech subsystems (Klopfenstein, 2015;Legner & Ziegler, 2022;Schölderle et al, 2016). In children with dysarthria, communication-related research has predominantly focused on intelligibility, while naturalness has not been studied comprehensively so far, neither on its own, nor in its relationship to intelligibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53,54 Even among healthy speakers, those with a faster speaking rate may be judged as more competent and socially attractive than speakers with a slower rate. 55 Alternatively, rate and pause features may indirectly interfere with communicative participation by indexing a third variable, 56,57 such as speech impairment severity. Future studies on the effects of rate modification are needed to further investigate its direct and indirect impacts on communicative participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also likely that factors other than pitch variability contribute to naturalness, even for EL speech. Rate, rhythm, stress pattern and volume are just a few of these known factors [14,15]. Although amplitude was equalized for all samples in this study, we did not control speech rate, rhythm or stress patterns when eliciting stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitch variation, as measured by standard deviation of f0, was significantly higher when using the EMG-EL than TruTone EL, for all Speakers (p<.001). (14) 90 3Speaker 1, whose naturalness ratings were consistently low, expressed a preference for higher pitch and produced a notably higher f0 from other Speakers throughout the testing.…”
Section: Mean and Sd F0mentioning
confidence: 98%