2023
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2208883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between care pathway features and use or non-use of orthotic devices by individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a cross-sectional, exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that 56% of CMT subjects used the prescribed lower limb orthoses, with 39% of patients wearing shoe inserts and 23% carrying AFOs, which is in keeping with what reported by Pisciotta et al from the Italian registry. 2 In contrast, both Prada and colleagues 4 and Blouin and coauthors 5 found more frequent use for both shoe inserts (55% and 47%, respectively) and AFOs (30% and 46%, respectively). In our series, patients answered on a voluntary basis to several questionnaires, so they were not biased towards the use of orthotics, as may happen for a population specifically investigated for orthotic devices as in the case of the study by Blouin et al 5 or where patients lacking information about use of insoles or orthoses were excluded as for the series by Prada et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We found that 56% of CMT subjects used the prescribed lower limb orthoses, with 39% of patients wearing shoe inserts and 23% carrying AFOs, which is in keeping with what reported by Pisciotta et al from the Italian registry. 2 In contrast, both Prada and colleagues 4 and Blouin and coauthors 5 found more frequent use for both shoe inserts (55% and 47%, respectively) and AFOs (30% and 46%, respectively). In our series, patients answered on a voluntary basis to several questionnaires, so they were not biased towards the use of orthotics, as may happen for a population specifically investigated for orthotic devices as in the case of the study by Blouin et al 5 or where patients lacking information about use of insoles or orthoses were excluded as for the series by Prada et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 In contrast, both Prada and colleagues 4 and Blouin and coauthors 5 found more frequent use for both shoe inserts (55% and 47%, respectively) and AFOs (30% and 46%, respectively). In our series, patients answered on a voluntary basis to several questionnaires, so they were not biased towards the use of orthotics, as may happen for a population specifically investigated for orthotic devices as in the case of the study by Blouin et al 5 or where patients lacking information about use of insoles or orthoses were excluded as for the series by Prada et al 4 We were not able to retrieve any data from the literature to compare with the rate of almost 20% of orthopaedic shoe users among our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations