Relationship between Caries and Fluoride Uptake by Enamel from Two Fluoride Varnishes in a Community with Fluoridated Water

Seppä, Liisa; Hausen, Hannu; Luoma, H

doi:10.1159/000260627

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, we noticed that Seppa and Hausen also been published research papers with Iuoma with the University of Kuopio. 13,14…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, we noticed that Seppa and Hausen also been published research papers with Iuoma with the University of Kuopio. 13,14 The last collaborative network is composed of three British scholars: Goodwin from the University of Manchester and Michaela and Maguire from the University of Newcastle. Figure 5d is the detail information of co-authorship network of more than 3 authors.…”

Section: Co-authorship Between Countries Institutions and Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Water fluoridation : A bibliometric study from 1950 to 2020

Liu,

Yuan,

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Water fluoridation (WF) is considered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)to be one of the top ten public health achievements of the 20th century. However, discussions about WF have been ongoing. The purpose of this study is to collect and analyze the scientific literature for WF and understand the keyword network of the entire field, important articles, high-yield countries, institutions and authors, and the mutual cooperation between them. The data of this research are extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) from 1950 to 2020. In total, 1,008 articles were published. The United States published the largest number of papers. Australia’s University of Adelaide ranks first among the top 20 institutions. Seven scholars, including AJ Spencer, constitute the largest author collaboration network. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology had the most publications, with 107 articles. Keywords density map found that the main keywords were dental caries, fluoride, children, drinking water, prevalence, and dental fluorosis. Keywords clusters mainly related to dental caries, fluoride, epidemiology research, and dental fluorosis. In the highly cited literature, we found that the research also focused on the relationship between stopping WF and caries and the systemic effects of WF.

show abstract

“…Moreover, we noticed that Seppa and Hausen also been published research papers with Iuoma with the University of Kuopio. 13,14…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Co-authorship Between Countries Institutions and Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water fluoridation : A bibliometric study from 1950 to 2020

Liu,

Yuan,

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…-In addition to the composition of the particular topical preparation selected for use, the outcome can Arends and Schuthof (1975) in vitro FP>APF=AmF Edenholm et al (1977) FP -OP Kolehmainen et al (1978) FP> DP> APF Retief et al (1980) FP>DP>APF Oijkman et al (1982) FP= OP> APF Retief et al (1983) FP-DP>APF Brewer et al (1987) APF> DPt Petersson (1976) in vivo OP > APF Gibbs et al (1981) FP=OP=APpt Seppa et al (1982a) FP>DP Seppa et al (1982b) FP>DPt Seppa (1984) FP>OP°F P = Fluor Protector; DP Duraphat; APF = Acidulated-phosphate-fluoride; AmF = amine F (Elmex).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Topical Fluoride Preparations

Mellberg

1990

J Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For practical reasons, evaluation of topical fluoride products must depend upon clinical and laboratory assessments. While not always a good predictor of clinical efficacy by itself, fluoride uptake is the most commonly used laboratory test. A consideration of the relationship between possible anticaries mechanisms of fluoride, different product types, and the meaning of various kinds of fluoride uptake data suggests that both the amount of fluoride taken up by early lesions and the amount of ambient fluoride present at a cariogenic site may play key roles in determining the efficacy of a product. While formulations applied annually or semi-annually probably depend on fluoride deposition, those used daily might not. There are no clear data supporting the superiority of one fluoride compound over another, even for infrequently used products, although there are significant differences among them in fluoride uptake by enamel. This suggests that fluoride uptake in vivo at a cariogenic site might actually be different from that suggested by in vitro data, or that larger differences are required for a clinical effect to be observable. Clinical data support the conclusion that a large increase in the fluoride concentration of a product will somewhat increase its anticaries effectiveness, although the increase will not be linearly related to concentration. There also are no obvious differences in clinical effectiveness caused by the addition of gelling agents to topical solutions. Fluoride varnishes are clinically effective but have not been shown to be superior to topical solutions or gels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

show abstract