2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between CD34/CD38 and side population (SP) defined leukemia stem cell compartments in acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ABCG2 could be a promising therapeutic target for the eradication of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) (9), based on the evidence that ABCG2 was responsible for the identification and isolation of the 'side population' (SP) phenotype using flow cytometry, due to the efflux of Hoechst 33342 from tumor cells, with cancer stem cell characteristics (10). SP cells are highly rich in LSCs, which are responsible for asymmetric cell division, self-renewal capacity and the maintenance of leukemia (11,12). Furthermore, ABCG2 facilitated the effusion of antineoplastic agents out of LSCs and plays a crucial role in the differentiation, proliferation and self-renewal of LSCs (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABCG2 could be a promising therapeutic target for the eradication of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) (9), based on the evidence that ABCG2 was responsible for the identification and isolation of the 'side population' (SP) phenotype using flow cytometry, due to the efflux of Hoechst 33342 from tumor cells, with cancer stem cell characteristics (10). SP cells are highly rich in LSCs, which are responsible for asymmetric cell division, self-renewal capacity and the maintenance of leukemia (11,12). Furthermore, ABCG2 facilitated the effusion of antineoplastic agents out of LSCs and plays a crucial role in the differentiation, proliferation and self-renewal of LSCs (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study concerning the relationships between CD34 with NPM1 mut or FLT3 ‐ITD described the distribution of FLT3 ‐ITD high almost exclusively in the CD34 (+) group and rarely in the CD34 (−) group, the latter entirely presenting FLT3 ‐ITD low features. 37 Thus, CD34 negativity may likely imply an absence of FLT3 ‐ITD or low AR, which partly explains the better prognosis of CD34 (−) patients than those with CD34 (+) . Our findings indicate that ID‐Ara‐C as a first‐line induction in NPM1 mut / FLT3 ‐ITD (+) patients improved the remission rate, especially for CD34 (+) patients at the initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, AR was detected in only some NPM1 mut / FLT3 ‐ITD (+) patients, so we did not include FLT3 ‐ITD AR in the analysis. A recent study concerning the relationships between CD34 with NPM1 mut or FLT3 ‐ITD described the distribution of FLT3 ‐ITD high almost exclusively in the CD34 (+) group and rarely in the CD34 (−) group, the latter entirely presenting FLT3 ‐ITD low features 37 . Thus, CD34 negativity may likely imply an absence of FLT3 ‐ITD or low AR, which partly explains the better prognosis of CD34 (−) patients than those with CD34 (+) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential way to improve the prognostic significance of MRD assessment is by adding information on leukemic stem cells (LSCs). LSCs, which are defined by CD34/CD38 expression among other antigens in the flowcytometric analysis of leukemia, seem critical for the development of AML and for relapse-initiation, because LSCs seem to have increased drug resistance and have self-renewal capacity at the same time [32]. Especially the side population (SP) was shown to have leukemia-initiating ability and harbored the strongest functional stem cell activity in CD34+ and CD34-AML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%