1999
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.8.2.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Clinical and Forceplate Measures of Postural Stability

Abstract: Although sophisticated forceplate systems are available for postural stability analyses, their use is limited in many sports medicine settings because of budgetary constraints. The purpose of this investigation was to compare a clinical method of evaluating postural stability with a force-platform sway measure. Participants completed a battery of three stance variations (double, single, and tandem) on two different surfaces (firm and foam) while standing on a force platform. This arrangement allowed for simult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
328
3
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
11
328
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the 20 sec trials were scored by counting the errors, or the deviations from the proper stance. An error was credited to the participant when any of the following occurred: a) moving the hand off the iliac crests; b) opening the eyes; c) stepping, stumbling, or falling; d) abduction or flexion of the hip beyond 30°; e) lifting of the forefoot or heel off the testing surface; or f) remaining out of the test position for more than 5 sec (Riemann et al, 1999). Participants who were unable to follow the testing procedure for a minimum of 5 sec were assigned the highest score, ten, for that testing condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of the 20 sec trials were scored by counting the errors, or the deviations from the proper stance. An error was credited to the participant when any of the following occurred: a) moving the hand off the iliac crests; b) opening the eyes; c) stepping, stumbling, or falling; d) abduction or flexion of the hip beyond 30°; e) lifting of the forefoot or heel off the testing surface; or f) remaining out of the test position for more than 5 sec (Riemann et al, 1999). Participants who were unable to follow the testing procedure for a minimum of 5 sec were assigned the highest score, ten, for that testing condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error scores were calculated for each of the 6 conditions and summed up to obtain the total BESS score. A full description of BESS and information regarding the test can be found in Riemann et al (1999). Each participant was instructed to remain as still as possible; if they moved from the test position, participants had to return to it as soon as possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BESS is a valid and reliable measure method of postural stability (Riemann et al, 1999). The test is cheaper than force platforms, requires less practice for effective administration, and can be used for immediate sideline assessment (Riemann et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose variables that are considered the standard measures of balance while standing (Jancová, 2008;Riemann, Guskiewicz, & Shields, 1999). Our hypotheses were that (1), after a full season, athletes would demonstrate deterioration of their postural control, and that (2) they would be more asymmetrical with respect to their performance in postural control tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%