1980
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between college teachers' use of humor in the classroom and students' evaluations of their teachers.

Abstract: In a field study, naive students unobtrusively tape-recorded one class presentation and evaluated the teacher as to appeal, competence, delivery, and teaching effectiveness. The presentations were content analyzed to identify key features relating to humor usage. Following a factor analysis of aspects of evaluation, correlation coefficients were computed between the teachers' frequency of use of the various types of humor and students' evaluations of their professors. The results indicate that for male teacher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bryant et al, 1980;Frymier et al, 2008;Wanzer and Frymier, 1999;Wanzer et al, 2006). In the field of applied linguistics, Lee (2006) uses data from the Michigan Corpus of Spoken English (MICASE) to show that laughter is frequent in American academic speech, including lectures.…”
Section: Humor In Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bryant et al, 1980;Frymier et al, 2008;Wanzer and Frymier, 1999;Wanzer et al, 2006). In the field of applied linguistics, Lee (2006) uses data from the Michigan Corpus of Spoken English (MICASE) to show that laughter is frequent in American academic speech, including lectures.…”
Section: Humor In Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus in much of the literature has been on whether humour is productive in improving memory recall or in directly improving learning. Indeed, there is no consensus in the literature that the use of humour can actually achieve this end anyway (see for instance, conflicting results from Bryant, Comisky, Crane, & Zillmann, 1980;Ennis, 2003;Fields, 2011;Fowler, 2006;Frymier, Wanzer, & Wojtasczyk, 2008;Hellman, 2007;James, 2004;Kaplan & Pascoe, 1977;Kuhrik, Kuhrik, & Berry 1997;Nesi, 2012;Powell & Andresen, 1985;Wanzer, Frymier, Wojtaszczyk, & Smith, 2006).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of this literature highlights the positive outcomes that result when humour is used in the classroom setting, such as the positive relationship between the use of humour and student learning (Ziv 1988, Gorham and Christophel 1990, Wanzer and Frymier 1999, Wanzer, Frymier and Irwin 2010 as well as teacher evaluations (Bryant et al 1980, Wanzer and Frymier 1999, Torok, McMorris and Lin 2004. Furthermore, the use of humour in the class room has been found to create an enjoyable learning environment (Ulloth 2002), where students are less anxious and stressed (Chabeli 2008) and more willing to participate.…”
Section: Humour In the Classroom Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%