Relationship between determinants of higher education and economic development: The case of Kazakhstan

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between higher education and economic development determinants in Kazakhstan’s regions. The paper used two sets of indicators of three-time series: 2010, 2015, and 2020. The analysis constructed a correlation using a panel dataset for 15 regions of Kazakhstan compiled by the Statistics Bureau of Kazakhstan and the National Bank. The first set reflects the determinants of higher education (number of students in colleges and universities, number of teaching staff, and the existing ICT infrastructure in universities). The second set includes indicators of regional economic development (GRP per capita and the population’s income level). The results showed a causal relationship between economic development and the determinants of higher education in the regions of Kazakhstan, which depend on the period. Surprisingly, the number of university students has almost no effect on GRP per capita and the population’s income level. For 2015–2020, the study observed the emergence and strengthening of correlations between economic growth and the development of innovations in universities. The findings also identified Mangystau, Atyrau, North Kazakhstan, and Pavlodar as regions with low innovation development in education. Therefore, the country’s higher education development policy should encourage and strengthen knowledge management systems in these regions. The study concludes that higher education and economic indicators significantly influence the growth of the economy in Kazakhstan. AcknowledgmentThe study was carried out within the framework of program-targeted IRN BR18574240 funding by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Development Strategy of Kazakhstan Regional Potential: Assessment of Socio-Cultural and Economic Potentials, Roadmap, Models and Scenarios Planning”.

From traditional to digital: The impact of drones and virtual reality technologies on educational models in the post-epidemic era

“…The educational process after the pandemic is characterized by a much more frequent use of digital technologies in education, which are constantly evolving and supplemented [25] education, as the use of digital tools provides wide access to student learning, provided that they are accessible [26], [27]. Digital transformation requires large-scale changes, a common vision of the participants in the educational process, and work on the effectiveness of the use of digital technologies in the educational process [28], [29], [30]. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of virtual reality technologies and the use of drones, including the study of the impact on the psychological and pedagogical aspects of the learning process.…”

Knowledge creation, knowledge impact and knowledge diffusion: how do they connect with higher education?

“…One of the most common ways of stimulating innovation is investing in research and development (R&D) (Mason et al, 2019), the development of intellectual property (Soumadi, 2023), and directly in higher education (Yu, 2023). In addition, numerous studies confirm that the level of education is essential in the formation of innovations, the accumulation of human capital and the socio-eco-nomic development of a region or country, the level of its national security (Samusevych et al, 2021;Cammeraat et al, 2021;Chentukov et al, 2021;Safarov et al, 2022;Karabayev et al, 2023). In particular, Yu et al (2023) argue that increased spending on education can increase the innovative capacity of human capital and enhance their ability to perceive and apply new technologies, leading to transformation and knowledge transfer.…”