2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between device-detected burden and duration of atrial fibrillation and risk of ischemic stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 31 More detailed analysis of AF burden dynamics and temporal distribution of AF episodes can be performed, such as analysis of AF density 32 that could provide a more granular characterization of AF, with potentially novel implications for assessing the relationship with stroke risk and atrial remodelling. In studies on CIEDs, both the burden of AF and the duration of AF episodes have been assessed and the two variables appear correlated to each other, although a direct association with stroke/TIA is not validated 33 unless variable combinations with CHADS 2 or CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc are taken into consideration. 21 Notably, these risk stratification scores were first proposed in the setting of clinical AF, and the reported incidence rates of stroke events were lower for AHRE compared with clinical AF, although with an increased risk of stroke associated with increasing stroke risk factors.…”
Section: Arrhythmia Burden: Dynamic Relationships Arrhythmia Progression and Clinical Implications For Stroke Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 More detailed analysis of AF burden dynamics and temporal distribution of AF episodes can be performed, such as analysis of AF density 32 that could provide a more granular characterization of AF, with potentially novel implications for assessing the relationship with stroke risk and atrial remodelling. In studies on CIEDs, both the burden of AF and the duration of AF episodes have been assessed and the two variables appear correlated to each other, although a direct association with stroke/TIA is not validated 33 unless variable combinations with CHADS 2 or CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc are taken into consideration. 21 Notably, these risk stratification scores were first proposed in the setting of clinical AF, and the reported incidence rates of stroke events were lower for AHRE compared with clinical AF, although with an increased risk of stroke associated with increasing stroke risk factors.…”
Section: Arrhythmia Burden: Dynamic Relationships Arrhythmia Progression and Clinical Implications For Stroke Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large VA cohort showed the greatest benefit of anticoagulation was for AF episodes more than 24 h 4 . Our group has shown that incidental detection of atrial fibrillation by implantable devices varies widely over time, so that even 30 s of atrial fibrillation (below the threshold of all currently available implantable monitors including the one studied here) may portend 2 h of atrial fibrillation in the future 5 . The data thus far signal that a “dose–response” effect of AF/AT does probably exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A recent KP-Rhythm study identified a higher risk of stroke in the high-load group (> 11%, approximately 2.5 h/24 h) [ 23 ]. A study including 384 patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device-detected AF not receiving oral anticoagulation suggested that the duration of AF was not associated with the risk of stroke, whereas the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was [ 24 ]. There is no standardized AF burden threshold to predict a significantly increased risk of thrombosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%