2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between fetal weight, placental growth and litter size in mice from mid- to late-gestation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
16
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the placental and embryonic weight on day 13 of gestation, the weight of male embryos on day 13 of gestation was greater than that of females in control and DES-treated groups. These results are compatible with those in CD-1 mice reported by Ishikawa et al (2006). Although there were no significant differences in the placental and fetal weights of the DES-exposed groups compared with those in the controls, the trends in fetal and placental weights were opposite.…”
Section: Embryonic Mortality and Placental Growthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the placental and embryonic weight on day 13 of gestation, the weight of male embryos on day 13 of gestation was greater than that of females in control and DES-treated groups. These results are compatible with those in CD-1 mice reported by Ishikawa et al (2006). Although there were no significant differences in the placental and fetal weights of the DES-exposed groups compared with those in the controls, the trends in fetal and placental weights were opposite.…”
Section: Embryonic Mortality and Placental Growthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are compatible with those in CD‐1 mice reported by Ishikawa et al . (). Although there were no significant differences in the placental and fetal weights of the DES‐exposed groups compared with those in the controls, the trends in fetal and placental weights were opposite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C57BL/6J mice from larger litters may be less sociable due to prenatal effects. It is not clear whether pups in large litters compete for nutritional resources in utero [112,113], but they do have relatively low birth weights [114,115] and they behaviorally and physiologically resemble undernourished mice in some ways [116]. In humans, both multiple concurrent births [64,68] and low birth weight [65,67,117,118] have been identified as risk factors for ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research conducted on guinea pigs, the general effect (litter size) was predominant in small litters, but the local effect (horn size) predominated in larger litters (Peaker and Taylor, 1996). In mice, some research suggests that the local effect of horn size is the predominating factor (McLaren and Michie, 1960; McLaren, 1965), while more recent research suggests that the general effect of litter size is the predominating factor (Ishikawa et al, 2006). Recent research on the rat has found that the general effect was the predominant factor on fetal weight in rats (Chahoud and Paumgartten, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetal body weight, in both rats and mice, is also affected, at least indirectly, by the number of fetuses occupying the individual horn, and to a somewhat lesser extent, by the overall litter size. Specifically, as the number of fetuses in both the horn and litter increases, the average fetal body weight decreases (Barr et al, 1970; Chahoud and Paumgartten, 2005, 2009; Ishikawa et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%