2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between field dependence-independence and the g factor: What can problem-solving strategies tell us?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FI is usually associated with superior performance on a range of cognitive and academic tests (Tinajero & Paramo, 1997, 1998), while FD is negatively related to sustained visuospatial attention (Amador-Campos & Kirchner-Nebot, 1999). Higher intelligence and creativity and the use of more efficient cognitive strategies are characteristics more readily observed in people with FI (Noppe & Gallagher, 1977; Remy & Gilles, 2014), indicating that FI is particularly beneficial for young people who are typically engaged in many novel learning experiences and in novel problem-solving.…”
Section: Fd or Fi And Cognitive Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FI is usually associated with superior performance on a range of cognitive and academic tests (Tinajero & Paramo, 1997, 1998), while FD is negatively related to sustained visuospatial attention (Amador-Campos & Kirchner-Nebot, 1999). Higher intelligence and creativity and the use of more efficient cognitive strategies are characteristics more readily observed in people with FI (Noppe & Gallagher, 1977; Remy & Gilles, 2014), indicating that FI is particularly beneficial for young people who are typically engaged in many novel learning experiences and in novel problem-solving.…”
Section: Fd or Fi And Cognitive Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some critics, the first generation of methods assessed cognitive ability rather than cognitive style (e.g., Evans et al, 1013;Rittschof, 2010;Sternberg & Grigorenko, 1997;Tiedemann, 1989;Kozhevnikov, 2007) since unsuitably high associations of cognitive style with general intelligence (e.g., Cooperman, 1980;Cuneo et al, 2018;Flexer & Roberge, 1980;McKenna, 1984;Riding & Pearson, 1994;Widiger et al, 1980;Weisz et al, 1975;Tinajero & Páramo, 1997;Vernon, 1972;Rémy & Gilles, 2014), spatial ability (e.g., Boccia et al, 2016;MacLeod et al, 1986;Zhang et al, 2004), working memory (e.g., Bahar & Hansell, 2000;Miyake et al, 2011), attention (e.g., Fitzgibbons et al, 1965;Guisande et al, 2007), and academic achievement (Páramo & Tinajero, 1990;Tinajero & Páramo, 1997) have been found in previous studies.…”
Section: Old Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance on the EFT has been shown to associate with global and local processing (Poirel et al, ), spatial thinking (Rémy & Gilles, ), and orientation abilities (Boccia, Piccardi, Di Marco, Pizzamiglio, & Guariglia, ), as well as general cognitive abilities (Flexer & Roberge, ; Miyake, Witzki, & Emerson, ). This has resulted in a lack of clarity about what FI represents (Evans, Richardson, & Waring, ).…”
Section: Measures Of Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature sometimes describes FI in perceptual terms, where success is related to overcoming the Gestalt principles of proximity, similarity, and good continuation (De‐Wit et al, ; Van der Hallen et al, ). However, it is also described in cognitive terms, as the extent to which individuals are able to analyze and restructure a given stimulus to solve a problem that requires details to be decontextualized (Pithers, ; Rémy & Gilles, ; Witkin, Moore, Goodenough, & Cox, ). In both the EFT and Block Design tasks, the visual stimulus needs to be reinterpreted by being parsed into smaller elements.…”
Section: Measures Of Fimentioning
confidence: 99%