1981
DOI: 10.1038/289169a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between fungus and alga in the lichen Cladonia cristatella Tuck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though not as well characterized as the interactions between mycorrhizal partners, detailed microscopic analysis shows that the lichen mycobiont loses apical dominance and undergoes extensive hyphal branching during its initial interaction with the photobiont (Ahmadjian andJacobs 1981, summarized in Ahmadjian 1993). Several candidates have been suggested for the photobiontderived signal that elicits this response, including plant hormones (IAA, kinetin) and the sugar alcohol, ribitol (Ahmadjian 1993). However, it seems likely that, as with mycorrhizae, a small molecule such as strigolactones will emerge as the lichen ''branching factor.''…”
Section: Mycologiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not as well characterized as the interactions between mycorrhizal partners, detailed microscopic analysis shows that the lichen mycobiont loses apical dominance and undergoes extensive hyphal branching during its initial interaction with the photobiont (Ahmadjian andJacobs 1981, summarized in Ahmadjian 1993). Several candidates have been suggested for the photobiontderived signal that elicits this response, including plant hormones (IAA, kinetin) and the sugar alcohol, ribitol (Ahmadjian 1993). However, it seems likely that, as with mycorrhizae, a small molecule such as strigolactones will emerge as the lichen ''branching factor.''…”
Section: Mycologiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also have allelochemical, antiviral, antibacterial, antiherbivoral, anti-oxidant, and antitumor properties. Although the nature of the relationships in lichens is still the subject of debate, it is widely accepted that it ranges from mutualism to controlled parasitism and changes dynamically over time (e.g., Ahmadjian and Jacobs 1981;Nash 1996;Richardson 1999). The definition of a lichen is further complicated by the presence of diverse, thallus-associated eukaryotic and prokaryotic entities (Zedda and Rambold 2015), including fungi (parasites, saprotrophs, and parasymbionts; Hawksworth 1982Hawksworth , 2015Lawrey and Diederich 2003;Selbmann et al 2013), non-symbiotic algae (diatoms; Lakatos et al 2004), terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (arthropods, nematodes, Alveolata, Metazoa, Rhizaria; Bates et al 2012), protists (Šatkauskienė 2012), as well as bacterial communities (Bates et al 2011;Aschenbrenner et al 2016).…”
Section: Fungal Associations With Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may especially be the case in lichens which are a fungal-algal symbiosis whose status as integrated organisms has been generally recognized only relatively recently (17). Although the nutritional relationships between the symbionts remain in dispute (1), it now appears clear that the lichen symbiosis reflects a long history of coevolution resulting in stable lichen species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%