J OB SATISFACTION CAN BE DEFINED in a number of ways. Two of these are the degree of personal gratification one receives from one's work and the pleasure and feeling of accomplishment employees derive from performing their jobs well. 1,2 Pharmacists' job satisfaction has been studied since the mid 1960s, typically utilizing questionnaires such as that used by Barnett and Kimberlin. 3 There are 2 ways that job satisfaction is most often measured. It can be broken down into specific features of the job that result in either satisfaction or dissatisfaction, or it can be measured on a global satisfaction scale without reference to particular aspects of the work. 2 Job satisfaction measures can provide extensive information to help employers change their current working environments to increase their employees' overall satisfaction. Currently, pharmacists have a higher job turnover rate than other sectors of the national economy. 4 This high turnover rate is predominantly due to pharmacists' dissatisfaction with their work. 5 Other factors that have been shown to affect pharmacist job satisfaction are utilization of skills and type of practice setting. 6 Studies in this field can help clarify the areas of pharmacy that need improvement, hopefully resulting in increased satisfaction and decreased turnover among pharmacists. 2 Previous hospital pharmacy job satisfaction questionnaires have made comparisons between various subsets of pharmacist roles. 7,8 The tool most often used was developed by Barnett and Kimberlin (1986), 3 which allows for meaningful comparison among various surveys' results. This tool examines Purpose: To determine whether staff, clinical, or integrated hospital pharmacists have greater job satisfaction and if sex, years worked as a pharmacist, or having children changes job satisfaction. Methods: A prospective study was performed by distributing a 63-item questionnaire to inpatient pharmacists working at 2 hospitals. Respondents mailed the completed questionnaires to the investigators. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 38 participants (mean age [SD] = 38.36 [10.97]). Fourteen (36.85%) participants who spent 0% to 40% of their time in clinical activities were categorized as staff, 10 (26.30%) who spent 41% to 60% of their time in clinical activities were integrated, and 14 (36.85%) who spent greater than 61% of their time in clinical activities were clinical pharmacists. All pharmacists reported mean satisfaction scores above 2.5, indicating that all were satisfied in their jobs. Differences were noted in the amount of satisfaction. For work environment and professional interaction, integrated pharmacists were more satisfied than staff (P < .05). For professional interaction and personal outlook, clinical pharmacists were more satisfied than staff (P < .05). Conclusion: Job satisfaction was directly related to the number of clinical activities performed. Integrated and clinical pharmacists were both more satisfied than staff pharmacists.