Relationship Between Immobilization of Cells and Characterization of Binding Sites and of Cell-Free Bacteria and Immobilized Metal Biosorbents

Abstract

Cell immobilization is preferred. Immobilized cells have been traditionally used for the treatment of sewage. The techniques employed for immobilization of cells are almost the same as those used for immobilization of enzymes with appropriate modifications. Entrapment and surface attachment techniques are commonly used. Gels, and to some extent membranes, are employed. Certain microorganisms were found to amass metallic components at a high limit Was Known as Bacterial Biosorption, Potent metal biosorbents among microorganisms, at low pH esteems, cell divider ligands are protonated and contend essentially with metals for official. With expanding pH, more ligands, such as amino and carboxyl groups, could be exposed, leading to attraction between these negative charges and the metals and consequently incremental biosorption onto the cell surface. Starting with isolation and identification of heavy metal-resistant bacteria from rock ore. Studying Factors Affecting Uranium Biosorption, Optimization of bacterial growth conditions and optimum for metal uptake by free and immobilized bacterial cells. All this evidence suggest that functions groups Represented in our study are responsible for metal uptake in our bacterial biomass beside change in peaks position which assigned for its groups confirm biosorption of metal ions from waste due to ions charge interaction comparing with immobilized we found increase in no of binding sites indicate that immobilized bacterial have high efficiency for metal up take which also change in peaks position which assigned for its groups confirm biosorption of metal ions from waste due to ions charge interaction, Where the high biosorption yield obtained by bacteria.