1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90196-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between length of stay and manipulation rate after total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature however reports patellar crepitation ranging from 0% to 13.5% [19,23]. Although both techniques of MIS TKA did not result in a stiff knee or the need for manipulation later in our patients, the literature reports 2% to 13.5% rates of manipulation [7,18,21,25,34]. We found a 7% (four of 60 knees) incidence of anterior knee pain with a mean VAS score of 1 point (range, 0-1 points) for anterior knee pain at the 1-year followup in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The literature however reports patellar crepitation ranging from 0% to 13.5% [19,23]. Although both techniques of MIS TKA did not result in a stiff knee or the need for manipulation later in our patients, the literature reports 2% to 13.5% rates of manipulation [7,18,21,25,34]. We found a 7% (four of 60 knees) incidence of anterior knee pain with a mean VAS score of 1 point (range, 0-1 points) for anterior knee pain at the 1-year followup in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The incidence of MUA has been reported as 1.3% to 13.5% [7,14,25,30]. Our analysis provides an incidence of 2.3% of knees having a NRR for stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Reoperations may include manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), irrigation and débridement (I&D), arthroscopy, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and others. While incidences of individual complications requiring such reoperations have been reported [1,2,4,6,7,9,11,12,14,21,25,29] (Table 1), the comprehensive profile of indications for nonrevision reoperation (NRR) following primary TKA is unreported. Knowledge of the incidence, indication, timing, and predictors of NRR will allow for an efficient use of resources in targeting the most common causes for reoperation, continuing research in preventing these complications, and identifying patients at the greatest risk so preventative measures may be taken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable loss of range of motion of the knee may occur in 1% to 15% of patients who have undergone primary TKAs [12,17,18,23,31,34]. Additionally, the frequency of knee stiffness may be even higher in patients who have had revision TKA, especially after treatment of a periprosthetic infection [2,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%