2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02318-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn in medical students

Abstract: Background In self-regulated learning, learning is defined as metacognitively guided, intrinsically motivated and strategic. In the context of medical education, the development of self-regulated learning can be associated with better academic and clinical performance. Hence, this report focuses on demonstrating the association between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn among medical students in the clinical sciences portion of their education (3rd and 4th years of the medical prog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
36
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding points out the high level of discipline of medical students with the learning of topics under study, and this autonomous learning profile need to be stimulated with online education strategies. [3] , [12] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding points out the high level of discipline of medical students with the learning of topics under study, and this autonomous learning profile need to be stimulated with online education strategies. [3] , [12] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative analysis was carried out in relation to open-ended questions in the surveys. Participant responses were categorized and analyzed according to traditional methods of content analysis [ 22 , 23 ]. Correlation analysis of the association between two ordered factors was performed using kendall coefficient correlation τb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative analysis was carried out in relation to open-ended questions in survey. Participant responses were categorized and analyzed according to traditional methods of content analysis [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%