2016
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between muscle volume and contractile properties of the human knee extensors

Abstract: The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between volume and electrically evoked twitch properties of the quadriceps muscle. Supramaximal single and doublet stimulation of the femoral nerve was used to assess contractile properties at 45° and 80° knee flexion. Muscle volume was measured using a 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Quadriceps muscle volume was only significantly correlated (r = 0.629) with peak twitch torque induced by doublet stimulation at 80° but not at 45° knee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of relationship between strength and thickness asymmetries is probably due to the fact that thickness was only evaluated for a single – even if representative – quadriceps muscle head (i.e., vastus lateralis), but not for the others (i.e., vastus medialis and intermedius, rectus femoris), which might even undergo greater muscle atrophy [12]. In contrast, the evaluation of muscle contractile function by means of the evoked torque provides a good estimation of the entire quadriceps muscle mass [23]. The observed evoked torque asymmetries might also indicate that qualitative besides quantitative alterations, such as fatty degeneration, may affect quadriceps function after ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of relationship between strength and thickness asymmetries is probably due to the fact that thickness was only evaluated for a single – even if representative – quadriceps muscle head (i.e., vastus lateralis), but not for the others (i.e., vastus medialis and intermedius, rectus femoris), which might even undergo greater muscle atrophy [12]. In contrast, the evaluation of muscle contractile function by means of the evoked torque provides a good estimation of the entire quadriceps muscle mass [23]. The observed evoked torque asymmetries might also indicate that qualitative besides quantitative alterations, such as fatty degeneration, may affect quadriceps function after ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed below, our results supported that this strong relationship might be due to neural mechanisms. Since MVC torque is, in part, related to muscle size (Baxter and Piazza 2014) and it was previously reported that doublet twitch torque is moderately-to-highly correlated with muscle size (Ryan et al 2011;Mau-Moeller et al 2015;Behrens et al 2016), it could be expected between-muscle group correlations for evoked peak torque. However, only correlations between knee extensors and plantar flexors, knee extensors and elbow flexors, and dorsiflexors and elbows flexors were found.…”
Section: A Common Construct Of Limb Strength In Young Healthy Peoplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This may suggest that the distribution of muscle quantity between human muscles is not always consistent within an individual. Nevertheless, the relationship between twitch peak torque and muscle size has been established only for plantar flexors and knee extensors (Ryan et al 2011; Mau -Moeller et al 2015;Behrens et al 2016) but not for elbow flexors and dorsiflexors. Furthermore, twitch peak torque is not only related to muscle size or force-generating capacity but also to other factors, such as muscle length, Ca 2+ sensitivity and muscle-tendon stiffness (Mayfield et al 2016) that can also influence between-muscle correlations in twitch peak torque.…”
Section: A Common Construct Of Limb Strength In Young Healthy Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Muscle volumes were calculated as the sum of crosssectional areas of each slice and the interpolated cross-sectional area of the slice gaps (Figure 1). 28,33,34 Muscle volume was selected over maximal anatomical cross-sectional area because muscle volume is a better predictor of joint torque and volume is a more complete measure of muscle mass. 28,35 Nevertheless, the Pearson product moment correlation between calculated muscle volumes and maximal cross-sectional areas were r =0.87 in our present study.…”
Section: Imaging Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%