2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
85
1
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
85
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…16 In contrast, our results suggest that ITER scores can discriminate resident technical performance. We found that a failing score on the OSATS in PGY-1 was associated with significantly poorer technical skills in PGY-2, based on ITER data.…”
Section: Bottom Linecontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16 In contrast, our results suggest that ITER scores can discriminate resident technical performance. We found that a failing score on the OSATS in PGY-1 was associated with significantly poorer technical skills in PGY-2, based on ITER data.…”
Section: Bottom Linecontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…One is the use of ITER data, which have been criticized for being poor at identifying below-average residents. 16 However, while the reliability of the ITER can be low with a single rater and a single evaluation, aggregated ITER data (as used in our study) with multiple evaluators and across multiple rotations have been shown to have good reliability and predictive validity. [31][32][33] The second limitation is its retrospective nature.…”
Section: Bottom Linementioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for practical and effective use in the surgical curriculum, tasks and metrics incorporated in the simulator need to be tested for objectivity and reliability. Consequently, each new training device must be assessed and validated.In the literature, the validation of training tools and their effectiveness are described using different theoretical models, but exact definitions vary among different authors [2,5,11]. One important step in evaluating new training tools is to assess construct validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the validation of training tools and their effectiveness are described using different theoretical models, but exact definitions vary among different authors [2,5,11]. One important step in evaluating new training tools is to assess construct validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%