Relationship between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition

Stahl, Franka; Grabowski, R; Gaebel, Manja; Kundt, Günther

doi:10.1007/s00056-007-2606-9

Cited by 70 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The frequency we assessed of sucking habits in primary dentition can be considered low. Stahl et al [15] reports 37% frequency of open mouth posture in primary dentition, which is comparable with our results. They also report prevalence of caudal and interdental tongue posture 21.4% and 12.5%, respectively, which is higher to our frequency rates.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…They also report prevalence of caudal and interdental tongue posture 21.4% and 12.5%, respectively, which is higher to our frequency rates. Ovsenik et al [1] found 35% prevalence of atypical swallowing pattern, while Stahl et al [15] report 62% frequency in primary dentition. It is difficult to compare this study's re-ported prevalence of orofacial dysfunctions and oral habits with results of other studies due to their different study designs, functional parameters and sample size.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prevalence of Orofacial Dysfunctions And Oral Habits in A Sample of 4-5-Year Old Bulgarian Children

Yovcheva¹,

Yordanova²,

Yordanova³

et al. 2017

IOSR JDMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Orofacial Dysfunctions And Oral Habits in A Sample of 4-5-Year Old Bulgarian Children

Yovcheva¹,

Yordanova²,

Yordanova³

et al. 2017

IOSR JDMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Orofacial functions were evaluated using the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) protocol, 11 translated and culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.…”

Section: Orofacial Functionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CPQ [8][9][10] is composed of 29 questions and the CPQ 11-14 of 41. The minimum possible score is zero, and the maximum possible score is 116 for the CPQ [8][9][10] and 164 for the CPQ [11][12][13][14] .…”

Section: Orofacial Functionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship among oral habits, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life in children

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The objective was to evaluate the relationship among oral habits, oral function and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children. Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects (8-14 years old) were assessed for orofacial function using the Brazilian version of the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S). OHRQoL was assessed using the Child Perceptions Questionnaires (Brazilian versions) for the 8-10 (CPQ 8-10 ) and 11-14 (CPQ 11-14 ) year age groups. The subjects were distributed into a Habit group and a Habit-free group according to domain III (Habits) of the NOT-S. Oral habits were present in 71.3% of the sample (p = .0001), with a higher prevalence in females (62.8%, p = .001). The NOT-S, CPQ 8-10 and CPQ 11-14 scores were higher in the Habit group (P = .0001, P = .009 and p = .001, respectively). Domain I (Sensory Function) was significantly more affected in Habit group subjects (p = .001). The NOT-S scores were positively correlated with the CPQ 8-10 and CPQ 11-14 scores only in the Habit group (r = .32, p = .0003 and r = .30, p = .001, respectively). These results indicate that oral habits can impact OHRQoL. Moreover, orofacial dysfunctions were associated with worse OHRQoL in subjects with oral habits.

show abstract

“…Ela inclui: ações vitais do organismo, como a respiração, a mastigação e a deglutição 2 ; postura muscular, como a postura dos lábios e língua 3,4 ; e atua como base para a interação social em relação à fala, para a comunicação emocional, à expressão facial e à aparência 2 . Desta forma, a disfunção orofacial pode ser severamente debilitante.…”

unclassified

Versão Brasileira do The Nordic Orofacial Test – Screening (NOT-S) para Avaliação de Disfunções Orofaciais

Leme¹

2011

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Traduzir o instrumento The Nordic Orofacial Test -Screening (NOT-S), que avalia disfunções orofaciais, para a língua portuguesa e realizar a adaptação transcultural em crianças brasileiras. Método: O instrumento foi submetido às seguintes etapas: tradução para português (Brasil), tradução reversa, revisão por comitê (composto por três professores universitários de Odontologia e um paciente formalmente instruído) e pré-teste. Para a fase de equivalência cultural (pré-teste), a cada um dos itens do instrumento foi acrescentada a alternativa "não entendi" ou "não aplicável", se o índice dessas repostas fosse superior a 15%, a questão deveria ser reformulada pelo comitê e reaplicada em outro grupo de crianças. O NOT-S foi aplicado em uma amostra de 20 crianças de 8 a 14 anos, de escolas da rede pública de Piracicaba, selecionadas aleatoriamente. Resultados: A comparação entre o instrumento original e o resultado da tradução reversa mostrou forte concordância entre ambos. As mudanças realizadas pelo comitê revisor foram o acréscimo de palavras e frases e a substituição de advérbios e palavras por sinônimos para facilitar o entendimento. No pré-teste, duas questões tiveram um índice de respostas "não entendi" de 15%, foram reformuladas e, a partir disso, o índice de resposta "não entendi" foi nulo. Conclusão: A versão em português do NOT-S foi criteriosamente traduzida e adaptada à cultura brasileira e mostrou-se ser de fácil compreensão pela população de crianças brasileiras avaliada. Sistema Estomatognático; Tradução (Processo); Criança. Objective: To translate the instrument The Nordic Orofacial TestScreening (NOT-S), which evaluates orofacial dysfunctions, intoBrazilian Portuguese and to perform the cross-cultural adaptation for Brazilian children. Method: The instrument was subjected to the following stages: translation into Brazilian Portuguese, back-translation, revision by a committee (composed by three Professors of Dentistry and a formally instructed patient) and pretest. For the phase of cultural equivalency (pretest), a "did not understand" or "does not apply" item was added to each one of the items of the instrument; if the rate of these answers was 15% or above, the question should be reformulated by the committee and reapplied to another group of children. The NOT-S was applied to a sample of randomly selected 20 children aged 8 to 14 years from public schools of the city of Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Results: There was a strong agreement between the original instrument and its back translated version. The changes made by the revising committee were the addition of words and sentences and the substitution of adverbials and words by synonyms to facilitate the understanding. In the pretest, two questions had 15% of "did not understand" answers and were reformulated; thereafter, the rate of "did not understand" answers was null. Conclusion:The final Portuguese version of NOT-S was rigorously translated and adapted to the Brazilian culture, and was easily understood by the sample of Brazilian childre...

show abstract

Relationship between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition

Cited by 70 publications

References 27 publications

Prevalence of Orofacial Dysfunctions And Oral Habits in A Sample of 4-5-Year Old Bulgarian Children

Prevalence of Orofacial Dysfunctions And Oral Habits in A Sample of 4-5-Year Old Bulgarian Children

Relationship among oral habits, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life in children

Versão Brasileira do The Nordic Orofacial Test – Screening (NOT-S) para Avaliação de Disfunções Orofaciais

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About