2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after bi-maxillary osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The occlusal force was measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, using the Dental Prescale System according to previous studies 20,21. Intra class correlation coefficients >0.92 indicated high consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occlusal force was measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, using the Dental Prescale System according to previous studies 20,21. Intra class correlation coefficients >0.92 indicated high consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasal airways of 35 cases (70 sides) were measured with CT before surgery and after 1-year surgery, in similar method previously published 23,24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasal airways of 35 cases (70 sides) were measured with CT before surgery and after 1-year surgery, in similar method previously published. 23,24 The nasal airway area was measured in three coronal planes across anterior nasal spine (ANS), posterior nasal spine (PNS) and midpoint between ANS and PNS perpendicular to Frankfurt horizontal plane in each side. The coronal area at the ANS was defined as all regions of the nostril.…”
Section: Computed Tomography Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An assessment developed by the Institute of Health Economics 21 was used to determine the quality of the 10 before-after studies. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] This quality assessment tool comprises 20 criteria. Due to not being relevant, two criteria concerning additional interventions and adverse events were considered not applicable and omitted.…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%