2019
DOI: 10.46328/ijres.v6i1.690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Personality Type and Preferred Teaching Methods for Undergraduate College Students

Abstract: This empirical study examined the relationship between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality types and preferred teaching methods for 507 Saint Joseph’s College of Maine undergraduate students.  The students completed two instruments: the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®, Form M (Myers, McCaulley, Quenk, & Hammer, 1998), and a 27-item scale that measured preferred teaching methods in the classroom. Descriptive and inferential statistics indicated that the five most prominent personality types were ISF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the 3P theory, the preparation variables in presage phase also include other learning quality such as expectations, and classroom climate and the preparation variables in process phase also include learning strategies such as deep learning or rote. As frequently examined in the 3P teaching and learning model-related empirical literature, more preparation variables may join force with relevant preparation variables above to influence learning achievement [ 140 143 ]. Future research needs to incorporate more variables to examine the adaptation of 3P theory model in the environment of EFL blended teaching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on the 3P theory, the preparation variables in presage phase also include other learning quality such as expectations, and classroom climate and the preparation variables in process phase also include learning strategies such as deep learning or rote. As frequently examined in the 3P teaching and learning model-related empirical literature, more preparation variables may join force with relevant preparation variables above to influence learning achievement [ 140 143 ]. Future research needs to incorporate more variables to examine the adaptation of 3P theory model in the environment of EFL blended teaching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Biggs’ learning process theory, the presage factors include other aspects, such as prior knowledge and motivation ( Biggs, 1993 ). These variables may jointly influence learning outcomes with learning experience ( Gentrup et al, 2020 ; Murphy et al, 2020 ; Brod, 2021 ). Future research should combine these variables to test the adaptability of Biggs’ learning process theory model in blended learning environments.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically categorizing individuals as introverts if they prefer to place greater attention on and receive energy from spending time in the inner world of images and ideas versus extroverts in the outer world of things and people [11]. To our knowledge, the relationship between MBTI introversion vs. extroversion as it relates to students' preferences in lecture modality has not been thoroughly examined in medical students, aside from questionnaires to determine broader relationships between personality traits and learning styles [13,14].…”
Section: Personality Typementioning
confidence: 99%