2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between phase angle and physical performance measures in community-dwelling older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study revealed a PhA mean of 5.52° for the total sample, 5.83° for men, and 5.42° for women ( Table 1 ). The observed significant difference between sexes is in line with previous studies in older adults [ 15 , 16 ]. Additionally, this study presented higher values than those reported in other studies performed in older adults with a higher mean age [ 18 , 27 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study revealed a PhA mean of 5.52° for the total sample, 5.83° for men, and 5.42° for women ( Table 1 ). The observed significant difference between sexes is in line with previous studies in older adults [ 15 , 16 ]. Additionally, this study presented higher values than those reported in other studies performed in older adults with a higher mean age [ 18 , 27 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In inflammatory processes involving oxidative stress and changes in cell membranes, PhA can be a critical factor in distinguishing the degree of inflammation and cell oxidation within a morphofunctional evaluation protocol [ 11 , 12 ]. Hence, PhA from BIA has been described as a global health marker [ 13 ] and as a muscle index [ 14 ] that can predict several outcomes in older adults, such as physical and muscle function [ [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] ], muscle mass [ 19 ], inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers [ 20 , 21 ], total and regional BMD [ 22 ], mortality risk [ 23 , 24 ], upper body strength, agility, and dynamic balance, regardless of the potential confounding effects of sex, age, and skeletal muscle [ 16 ]. In line with the previous statements, it was also possible to verify connections between PhA and the 30-seconds (sec) chair‐stand test, timed up & go (TUG) test, arm curl test and 6-min walking test (6 MWT) in older women [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study confirmed the associations between the PhA and the 6 min walk test, 30 s chair stand, 30 s arm curl, timed up and go, gait speed, handgrip strength and physical performance score. These findings support the suggestion that the PhA could be a useful biomarker to estimate physical performance [ 18 , 45 , 46 ]. Besides functional performance, the PhA has been shown to correlate with muscle strength or power [ 47 , 48 ], knee extensor strength [ 49 ] and maximal torque of plantar and dorsal flexion [ 50 ], in middle-aged or older populations [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Matias et al [ 17 ] showed a mean value of 5.5° ± 0.7° for the total sample, 5.3 ± 0.5° for women and 5.9 ± 0.7° for men, and revealed significant differences between the sexes. Additionally, Germano et al [ 24 ] showed mean values of 5.9 ± 0.7° for men and 5.4 ± 0.7° for women, and also showed significant differences between the sexes. Another study [ 25 ], where participants had a similar age (80.5 ± 7.0), also showed higher values than our study; 5.2 ± 1.3° for men and 5.7 ± 1.0° for women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%