2020
DOI: 10.1166/asem.2020.2518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Rising Phase of Solar Cycle 23rd and 24th with Respect to Geoeffectiveness

Abstract: The current article demonstrates the geoeffectiveness of solar flare associated Coronal mass ejection (CME) accompanied with Deca-hectometric (DH) type II radio bursts by comparing the set of events in the rising phase of solar cycle 23rd (1996–2001) and 24th (2009–2014). Our observations are: (i) Solar cycle 23rd have high Dst index than the solar cycle 24th except for the year 1999. (ii) Dst has its peak between 3rd to 5th day after the CME onset for both the solar cycles. (iii) The correlation coefficient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the last two solar cycles, the 23rd one has been more geoeffective than the 24th one (Bhatt and Chandra, 2020). Solar cycle 24 was characterized by low flare activity and the main contribution to geoeffective events was made by CMEs (Bruevich and Yakunina, 2020).…”
Section: Solar Cycle Dependencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparing the last two solar cycles, the 23rd one has been more geoeffective than the 24th one (Bhatt and Chandra, 2020). Solar cycle 24 was characterized by low flare activity and the main contribution to geoeffective events was made by CMEs (Bruevich and Yakunina, 2020).…”
Section: Solar Cycle Dependencementioning
confidence: 97%