2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and clinical data from five wastewater sheds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in wastewater exhibited good relationship with reported active and hospitalised COVID-19 cases and showed good agreement with previous studies ( Acosta et al, 2022 , 2023 ; Mohapatra et al, 2023 ; Wartell et al, 2022 ). However, there was variability in the strength of the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations and clinical data throughout the four waves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in wastewater exhibited good relationship with reported active and hospitalised COVID-19 cases and showed good agreement with previous studies ( Acosta et al, 2022 , 2023 ; Mohapatra et al, 2023 ; Wartell et al, 2022 ). However, there was variability in the strength of the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations and clinical data throughout the four waves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Here, the estimation of the number of absent workers due to COVID-19 infections was performed via a Poisson regression model. Other studies also have shown the trends and strong correlation of clinical data with the SARS-CoV-2 RNA abundance in wastewater on a weekly basis (Wartell et al 2022; Fahrenfeld et al 2022; Halwatura et al 2022; Krivoňáková et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To date, WBS studies have primarily focused on understanding the temporal changes in COVID-19 in communities by measuring SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in wastewater derived from WWTP (Pang et al 2022; Acosta et al 2022; Ahmed et al 2020; de Sousa et al 2022; Hasan et al 2021; Karthikeyan et al 2021; Wartell et al 2022; Tandukar et al 2022; Acosta et al 2021; Gonçalves et al 2021; Wang et al 2020; Zhou et al 2021; Gibas et al 2021; Betancourt et al 2021; Dai et al 2022). These data have enabled evidence-informed decisions by public health officials as well as members of the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rapid and cost-effective approach offers valuable insights into the presence and prevalence of viruses, bacteria associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and their AMR genes at a community level [2,5,7,8]. Studies have shown a high correlation between wastewater data and clinical data and therefore WWS has been proposed as a valuable and independent approach complementing traditional clinical epidemiology [9][10][11][12]. In addition of monitoring ongoing circulation of pathogens within a population, there are some evidence indicating the potential of WWS to anticipate future outbreaks [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%